• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

This integral of k dt needed to get this mark-M1?

  • Thread starter inv
  • Start date
  • #1
inv
45
0
[Solved]This integral of k dt needed to get this mark-M1?

Homework Statement


Hi.The material,the question and the marking scheme respectively for my pure maths paper 3 question x1 only is shown below,it's an A2-level Oct 2002 paper if u know what that is.

Picture001.jpg


Picture002.jpg


Is the integral circled in red needed to integrate?I find I don't need it.Am I wrong,if so why?


Homework Equations


Simple integration rules only.


The Attempt at a Solution


I did attempt by doing :
Integral of dt/da = integral of (.1 a^-1 + .1(10-a)^-1)
= .1 ln(a/(10-a))

Ps- there, I did it without the integral circled in red.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
You did the integral, but what's the solution to the problem? I.e. What is a as a function of t? I don't see any t dependence in your answer.
 
  • #3
inv
45
0
You did the integral, but what's the solution to the problem? I.e. What is a as a function of t? I don't see any t dependence in your answer.
The question is asking for t to be expressed in t=ca+d ,where a is a variable and the rest is constant.

Solution:
dt/da=250 {a(10-a)}^-1

t=integral of dt/da
=what I integrated

There's the t dependence in my answer too.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
Think clearly about this. If you believe you solved it, you ought to be able to tell me the value of a at t=1. How do you do that?
 
  • #5
inv
45
0
Think clearly about this. If you believe you solved it, you ought to be able to tell me the value of a at t=1. How do you do that?
Previous post I said "what I integrated" is on my hard copy. This is what it is-
t=25ln{a/(10-a)} .


I'm afraid if t=1 , I don't know how to find a.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
Ok. If you think about it, you did integrate k*dt. That's where the 250 came from in your expression. k=1/250. The integration is pretty trivial, but in solving equations like this it can easily come out to be not so. That's why it's written this way. The LHS could have been f(t)*dt for some complicated function f.
 
  • #7
inv
45
0
What do you mean
could have been
?
 
  • #8
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,258
618
I'm saying that if you do other differential equations by separation of variables, the 't' integration can be just as hard as the 'a' integration after you've separated the equation into f(t)*dt=g(a)*da. In this case the t dependence was so simple you didn't notice that you had integrated it.
 
  • #9
inv
45
0
U're implying that for every integration question like this on my paper 3 pure maths I need to specify the integral of $#%$ da = integral of k*dt like this case?

Edit :"$#%$" there wasn't a bad word ,I meant whatever the equation may be type "$#%$" da Dick. U're implying that?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
123
0
Not just for the maths papers. Deciding on the integrals is the next step. You are less likely to make a mistake if you write down each step.

Dick gave good advice.

Getting into the habit of doing this even for a simple case will help you when the going gets more difficult.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
inv
45
0
Hello Dick,u're implying it ?
 
  • #12
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,107
72
U're implying that for every integration question like this on my paper 3 pure maths I need to specify the integral of $#%$ da = integral of k*dt like this case?
You want to solve the equation [tex]\frac{da}{dt}=ka(10-a)[/tex]. This is a 1st order separable differential equation, and so to solve, we separate the variables so that we obtain [tex]\int \frac{da}{a(10-a)}=\int kdt[/tex]. The fact that we can separate this equation means that we can solve it by direct integration. Now, in this case, the t integral is trivial; namely the RHS=kt, however there are cases where this will not be so.

For example, suppose that the equation was [tex]\frac{da}{dt}=ka(10-a)t[/tex]. This is still separable, but now the t integral is non-trivial, and so on separation we obtain [tex]\int \frac{da}{a(10-a)}=\int kt dt[/tex]. This can still be solved, but now the RHS = k/2 t2.

The point that Dick was trying to make, and that the solution makes, is that you should get into the habit of separating the equation properly before integrating since, in general, the t integral is non-trivial.

Does this make any more sense?

edit: and yes, for the sake of the exam, I would say you need to include the separation step, since there will probably be a mark for noting that the equation is separable. (In fact, the "M1" in the margin indicates that there is a method mark for separating the equation)
 
Last edited:
  • #13
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,805
932
you need to integrate kdt to have an equation! If you only integrate the left side, you would have (1/10)ln(a/(10-a)) NOT equal to anything! Where would you go from there? As it is, you have (1/10)ln(a/(10-a))= kt+ C or ln(a/(10-a))= 10kt+ C which can be rewritten a/(10-a)= Ce^(10kt).
 

Related Threads for: This integral of k dt needed to get this mark-M1?

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
597
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
15K
Replies
5
Views
17K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
7K
Top