Time-dependent delta-function perturbation

  • Thread starter Thread starter carllacan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perturbation
carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


We have a system whose state can always be expressed as the sum of two states ##\Psi_a## and ##\Psi_b##. the system undergoes a perturbation of the form ##H'=U\delta(t)##, where ##\delta## is the delta-function in time and ##U_{aa} = U_{bb} = 0## and ## U_{ab} = U_{ba}^*##. Find the (time-dependent) coefficients of the system under such perturbation.

Homework Equations


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pertur...m_mechanics)#Method_of_variation_of_constants
image027.gif
, where V is ##U##.

The Attempt at a Solution


Griffiths (from whose book I got this exercise) suggests treating the delta-function as a limit in a series of rectangles, so I wrote the integral from -B to B and with a constant A in place of ##\delta##, intending to later take the limit when B → 0 and A→∞.

My solution, however, turns out to be independent of A (before taking limits), so I think it's wrong.

How would you approach this?

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are right that the integral will not depend on A (or B). So, taking the limit will be easy!

Your approach looks good to me. What expression(s) did you get after taking the integral from -B to B?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top