Time period of oscillation and displacement from O

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the period of oscillation (T) remains constant despite changes in displacement (A) in simple harmonic motion, specifically for springs. It is explained that, according to Hooke's Law, while the restoring force increases with displacement, the period is independent of amplitude, leading to a consistent frequency. The mechanics of simple harmonic oscillators show that greater displacement results in a proportionally greater restoring force, allowing for a faster cycle without altering the period. The conversation also touches on pendulum behavior, noting that the period can change at larger angles, but for small oscillations, it remains constant. Overall, the key takeaway is that in ideal simple harmonic systems, the period does not depend on amplitude.
magiclink
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the attachment!

The Attempt at a Solution


My big hangup in this situation is why T, the period, of the oscillation doesn't change?
If you increase the displacement by 2A does this mean that since the force acting on the spring also increases proportionally there's just no change in frequency and the time period of oscillation? I understand however that the energy in the system increases is quadrupled. graphing Force with respect to distance, it's 4 times the area underneath the graph if you double A, the displacement, according to hooke's law.

So! Why does the Time period of oscillation not change at all? This is what confuses me! Thankyou for any response :)
 

Attachments

  • Hooke's law and Time periods.jpg
    Hooke's law and Time periods.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 506
Physics news on Phys.org
hi magiclink! :smile:
magiclink said:
… why T, the period, of the oscillation doesn't change?

same as the reason why the period of a pendulum doesn't change (that's why a pendulum clock works steadily even though it's running down) …

it's a simple harmonic oscillator: the equation is x'' = -kx, and the solutions are harmonic functions with frequency √k, times constants :wink:
 
This is a feature of the simple harmonic oscillator, the period is independent of the amplitude. In terms of the mechanics, the greater maximum displacement means a greater restoring force so a faster trip through the cycle.

Imagine different spring force relationships, F = f(x). If the restoring force gets larger much faster as x increases then for larger displacements you get a faster cycle. (Imagine a rubber ball swinging on a pendulum and bouncing between two walls until it losses enough energy and simply swings at a slower rate.

Likewise if the restoring force grows more slowly with x you'll have what you intuition might imagine, larger amplitudes have longer periods. Example there, orbiting planets.

Somewhere in between there should be a spring force relationship where the period for all amplitudes match. That turns out to be the Hook's law case.
 
tiny-tim said:
hi magiclink! :smile:


same as the reason why the period of a pendulum doesn't change (that's why a pendulum clock works steadily even though it's running down) …

it's a simple harmonic oscillator: the equation is x'' = -kx, and the solutions are harmonic functions with frequency √k, times constants :wink:

Actually a true pendulum does change. We take the SHO approximation for small oscillations sin(\theta) \approx \theta. :wink: :wink:

The "rule of thumb" is when the pendulum swings more than 10° the SHO approximation breaks down and you shouldn't assume it has constant period. In the extreme case, if you start the pendulum all the way at the top it has infinite period. If it's not quite all the way up, you get a long wait while it slowly moves further off center and then the big swing.
 
Thankyou so much for your replies! It's helped me tremendously! :) I've wrapped my head around it now.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top