Timelike v. spacelike, is it arbitrary?

  • Thread starter BruceW
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation revolves around the use of different terms for proper time and proper length in general relativity. The main reason for using a definition that does not differentiate between the two is that in general relativity, coordinate time is often not defined, and calculations can still be done without considering the distinction. However, some argue that the difference between proper time and proper length is not artificial and should still be acknowledged. Additionally, there is a discussion about the possibility of defining arc length along a null curve and the use of non-standard definitions in physics. It is ultimately concluded that using standard definitions is crucial for effective communication, especially when helping others with homework.
  • #176
ah ok, I need to read more about this kind of stuff. I've just found some university websites that are pretty good. (wikipedia's explanation was pointing me in the wrong direction, by the way it was worded).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #178
thanks dude! that does look good. I'll definitely have a read if it is in my uni library - one of the perks of being at a university ;)
 

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
481
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
81
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
5
Replies
144
Views
6K
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
95
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
692
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top