Maximizing Torque: Comparing Square and Rectangular Coils in Magnetic Fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotaPhysicsMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coils Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the ratio of maximum torque between a square coil and a rectangular coil, both made from the same length of wire and containing a single turn. The square coil has equal side lengths, while the rectangular coil has sides in a 1:2 ratio. Initial calculations suggested a torque ratio of 1:2, but it was later corrected to account for wire length, leading to a revised ratio of 1.125. The importance of using the correct dimensions and understanding the wire length used for each coil was emphasized. The final conclusion highlights the need for careful consideration of coil dimensions in torque calculations.
NotaPhysicsMan
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Hey,
Any help will do:

A square coil and a raectangular coil are each made from the same length of wire. Each contains a single turn. The long sides of the rectangle are twice as long as the short sides. Find the ratio t(tau) square/t rectangle of the maximum torques that these coils experience in the same magnetic field when they contain the same current.

Ok what I know:

t=Fl, maximum torque is when the normal is at 90 degrees to the field.
I know that the lengths for all sides of the square are equal, so x.
And the rectangle has two sides x, and two sides 2x. Since we want max torque, we want the bigger lever arm so I'll use 2x.


----o---- 2x rectangle
--o-- x square

Ok so t=Fl
=IABsin@/IABsin@
=I(x^2)Bsin@/I(2x(x)Bsin@)
Since the I, B and sin@ are constant

ts/tr= x^2/2x^2
ts/tr=1/2? :confused:

Anyone want to verify thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone? Please :)
 
Aren't these two statements contradictory?

NotaPhysicsMan said:
A square coil and a raectangular coil are each made from the same length of wire.

NotaPhysicsMan said:
I know that the lengths for all sides of the square are equal, so x.
And the rectangle has two sides x, and two sides 2x.

Your rectangle is using 1.5 times as much wire as the square.
 
OH crap, I see. Ugh well let's see then 1.5 x for each side of the square.

Therefore ts/tr= (1.5^2)/(2)=1.125
!
Thanks for the reminder!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top