Torque applied on a lighting column

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the torque applied to a lighting column due to wind load and an additional arm. The initial torque calculation using the formula T = ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g was confirmed to be incorrect for a vertical column, as the action line of gravity passes through the base. The correct approach involves calculating the wind torque and the torque from the arm separately and then combining them. When adding a lighting armature, the user is advised to calculate its torque separately and then sum it with the torque from the arm. The user expressed gratitude for the guidance received, indicating they now have the necessary information to complete their program.
aon3t
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Greetings!

I am currently making a program which is about lighting columns. And I am currently at a halt because I need some basic physics done before I can complete it.

I have a lighting column which is
L = 8 m
D = 0.087 m
M = 69 kg

I have a force, applied from the wind load, at
F = 1235 N

Now I need to find the torque applied on the whole column. I have used this formula earlier
T = ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g (where I've used F = mg)

This have given me T = 4944 Nm.

I just need a validation if these calculations are correct.

Because my real problems starts now:

I want to add an arm to the top of the lighting column with these data

L = 3m
M = 36 kgs
D = 0.120m

And I wonder what the combined torque applied to the column is now?

The arm will be at a 90° angle outwards from the column like this → Γ

Later on I want to add a lighting armature to the arm and do the same calculations (but that won't be a problem when I understand how the arm affects the column).

English is not my first language, so bear with me if I am unclear, or not using the correct terms.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Hello aon, :welcome:

Just for clarification: is the column in a vertical position ? If so, there is no torque ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g (action line of mg goes through base of column).

With the arm (if it's horizontal) you can add T = ½ ⋅Larm⋅Marm⋅g to the wind torque T = ½ ⋅Lcolumn⋅Fwind

Not that at the top of the column the arm exerts this same torque T = ½ ⋅Larm⋅Marm⋅g
 
BvU said:
Hello aon, :welcome:

Just for clarification: is the column in a vertical position ? If so, there is no torque ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g (action line of mg goes through base of column).

With the arm (if it's horizontal) you can add T = ½ ⋅Larm⋅Marm⋅g to the wind torque T = ½ ⋅Lcolumn⋅Fwind

Not that at the top of the column the arm exerts this same torque T = ½ ⋅Larm⋅Marm⋅g

Thank you very much. This is currently how I've done it (I used the winload "Fwind" instead of Mg on the column just as you wrote). And yes, the column was in a vertical position.

So if I understand it right: I find the wind torque, and add this to the torque applied by the arm (which, as you said, applies the same torque to the top of the column)?

And one more question:

If I now want to add a lighting armature to this arm. Which have the following data:

L = 0.758m
M = 12 kg

Which is the best way to find the new Tarm?

a) Just add the mass and length to the arm (seeing it as a bit wider and heavier arm than before) and use the same formula as earlier?
b) Find the torque seperately and add them? (this gives me a lower torque than the suggestion above)
c) Find the Farmature=mg of the armature and just add this to the torque formula? (Idea is that then the whole force of the armature is applied to the tip of the arm)

I have the 3 examples (g ≈ 9.81):

a) T = ½ ⋅(Larm+Larmature)⋅(Marm+Marmature)⋅g = ½⋅(3+0.758)⋅(19+12)⋅9.81 = 571.42 Nm

b) Tarmature = ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g = ½⋅0.758⋅12⋅9.81 = 44.61 Nm
Tarm = ½ ⋅L⋅M⋅g = ½⋅3⋅19⋅9.81 = 279.6 Nm
T = Tarmature + Tarm = 44.61 + 279.6 = 324.21 Nmc) T = ½⋅Larm⋅(Marm+Farmature)⋅g = 456 Nm
 
Picture is worth ...

upload_2017-2-20_16-4-24.png


So far I have (at O, the base)
Fwind * 4 m ,
marm g * 1.5 m
marmature g * (3 + 1/2 * 0.758) m

At the top, only the latter two​
 
Thank you! Now I have all I need, I shall write a thanks to you when I hand in my paper for the program.

I had my eyes on how you solved the Tarmature, but I disregarded it because I found the T to be a bit smaller than expected, but that was because I forgot to add it to the Tarm.

Thanks a lot!
 
You're welcome. Good luck with the program.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top