Torque Confusion: Understanding rxF and m_i*g*(x_i, y_i, z_i)

  • Thread starter Thread starter yetar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Torque
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of torque in a 3D particle system under gravitational influence, specifically contrasting the definitions of torque as t = rxF and m_i*g*(x_i, y_i, z_i). Participants clarify that the torque of a particle in a gravitational field can be expressed as m_i(x_i, y_i, z_i) × g(0, -1, 0), leading to m_ig(z_i, 0, -x_i). The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the cross product in determining the center of mass, where the net torque must equal zero for equilibrium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and its mathematical representation (t = rxF)
  • Knowledge of gravitational force vectors (g = g(0, -1, 0))
  • Familiarity with the concept of center of mass in rigid body dynamics
  • Proficiency in vector cross products and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of torque in various coordinate systems
  • Learn about the implications of net torque equaling zero in rigid body equilibrium
  • Explore the mathematical properties of vector cross products in physics
  • Investigate the relationship between torque and center of mass in multi-particle systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as engineers and researchers dealing with rigid body dynamics and equilibrium analysis.

yetar
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


On my book, the torque is defined as:
t = rxF
F is the a[llied force on a particle, r is the distance of the particle from the origin.
However, later on, the book tries to find the center of mass of a 3D particle system and says the torque of a particle is m_i*g*(x_i, y_i, z_i) when gravity is present.
However gravity is G=g*(0, -1, 0), so I don't see how the torque of the particle in gravity relates to rxF, because the y coordinate of the particle torque should be zero.

Thank you.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

It is not clear for me where is emphasis of your question.
But i just know that:
If a particle with mass m_i at (x_i,y_i,z_i) in the gravitational field of the question, then the torque respective to the origin is
m_i(x_i,y_i,z_i)\times g(0,-1,0) = m_ig(z_i,0,-x_i)
In the last step, I expact that you have known the outer product (cross product) of vectors.
Hope these helpful.


Regards
 
variation said:
Hello,

It is not clear for me where is emphasis of your question.
But i just know that:
If a particle with mass m_i at (x_i,y_i,z_i) in the gravitational field of the question, then the torque respective to the origin is
m_i(x_i,y_i,z_i)\times g(0,-1,0) = m_ig(z_i,0,-x_i)
In the last step, I expact that you have known the outer product (cross product) of vectors.
Hope these helpful.


Regards

Ok, the purpose of what I read was to find the center of mass of the particle system.
This point needs to be the point that when some wedge is holding it, the particle system is in equilibrium. So the sum of the net Force is zero and also the sum of the net torque is zero.
From the sum of the net torque we get the center of mass.
But the problem is that the y coordinate of rxF for every force on every particle is zero.
And somehow from the equality of the sum of net torque equals to zero we get the center of mass?
In the last step, I expact that you have known the outer product (cross product) of vectors.
I know what is a cross product and how to calculate it if that is what you ask.
 
Do you mean that how to use the net torque vanishes and find the position of center of mass ? If yes, then ...

For a rigid system composed of particles which have mass m_i and position \mathbf{r}_i respectively, a pivot is fixed on the center of mass and the net torque of the total system is zero (respective to the pivot or center of mass). Of course, the position of the center of mass is nuknown and we can assume it as \mathbf{x}. Therefore,
\mathbf{N}=\sum_i(\mathbf{r}_i-\mathbf{x})\times m_i\mathbf{g}=0\quad\Rightarrow\quad\left(\sum_im_i\mathbf{r}_i\times\mathbf{g}\right)-\mathbf{x}\times\left(\sum_im_i\right)\mathbf{g}=0
\Rightarrow\quad\left(\sum_im_i\mathbf{r}_i\right)\times\mathbf{g}=\left(\sum_im_i\right)\mathbf{x}\times\mathbf{g}
,where the uniform gravitational field is used. Because the arbitrariness of the \mathbf{g} and one can conclude that \mathbf{x}=\frac{\sum_im_i\mathbf{r}_i}{\sum_im_i}.

Hope these helpful.


Goodluck
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
12K