Torque Provided By A Rocket's Thrust

  • Thread starter Thread starter cjavier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thrust Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a model rocket generating 4.0 N of thrust while spinning horizontally at the end of a rigid rod. A participant expresses confusion about why the gravitational pull of the rod is not considered in calculating total torque. It is clarified that since the rocket operates in a horizontal circle, the torque from the weight of both the rocket and the rod is balanced by the supporting structure. The participant acknowledges this understanding, resolving their confusion about the torque calculations. The importance of recognizing the horizontal motion in torque analysis is emphasized.
cjavier
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The Question Is: The 200 g model rocket shown in the figure generates 4.0 N of thrust. It spins in a horizontal circle at the end of a 100 g rigid rod. What is its angular acceleration? Here is the picture:

http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1073775/3/knight_Figure_13_24.jpg

However, I am confused that every answer I have seen does not take into account the torque generated by the rod's gravitational pull to produce the Total Torque (Sigma Torque). Why is this?

PLEASE do not just post to me how to get the answer. I have seen this. I also realize that the moment of inertia take's into account the rod. However, I still believe that the gravitational pull of the rod should be accounted for in the total torque. Please, someone with experience explain to me why this is not so.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are told that the rocket moves in a horizontal circle, so somehow the torque from the weight of rocket plus rod has already been balanced by the supporting structure.
 
Question Resolved

HORIZONTAL. I see now. Thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top