Total mass from mass distribution function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the total mass of an object with a mass distribution function m(r) = m0e^(-r), where r ranges from 0 to ∞. The initial approach suggested evaluating the mass at the boundaries, m(0) and m(∞), but there is uncertainty about how to proceed with the integral. Participants note the lack of guidance in their university module, which consists only of worksheets without lectures. Additionally, it is mentioned that the object is symmetrical and rotates about its symmetry axis at r=0. The conversation highlights the challenges faced in understanding the integral evaluation for total mass.
noreally
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An obect whose mass is distributed according to function m(r)=m0e-r, for r ranging from 0 to ∞. Calculate total mass of the object. Write down and evaluate appropriate integral.

2. The attempt at a solution

well, I wasnt sure really how to start but thought it may be m(0) + m(∞) where m(0) would become just m0 leaving m0+ me-∞. Although i really have no idea.

This is part of a really strange module at my uni where there are no lectures and just a worksheet given out every other week with no guidance. :/

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
noreally said:

Homework Statement



An obect whose mass is distributed according to function m(r)=m0e-r, for r ranging from 0 to ∞. Calculate total mass of the object. Write down and evaluate appropriate integral.

2. The attempt at a solution

well, I wasnt sure really how to start but thought it may be m(0) + m(∞) where m(0) would become just m0 leaving m0+ me-∞. Although i really have no idea.

This is part of a really strange module at my uni where there are no lectures and just a worksheet given out every other week with no guidance. :/

Thanks for any help!

Do you see any symmetry in the mass distribution ?
 
Thanks for the reply, yes the object is symmetrical as the next part of the question is that its rotating about its symmetry axis r=0.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top