Total osmolarity of blood? Curious about water weight vs. biological

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the osmolarity of blood, specifically the concentration of both blood cells and electrolytes in plasma. It highlights the difference between plasma osmolality, which focuses on electrolytes, and the overall blood composition that includes cells. The impact of blood donation on body concentrations is examined, noting that while electrolytes are quickly replenished, erythrocytes take weeks to recover, leading to a potential 92% concentration after donation. Additionally, there is curiosity about the energy required for the body to replenish blood components, though calculating this energy in relation to cell growth remains complex. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on blood composition and recovery processes post-donation.
pa5tabear
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Total "osmolarity" of blood? Curious about water weight vs. biological

I've seen plasma osmolality described on wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_osmolality

This looks at the concentration of electrolytes in the "plasma solvent". However, plasma is the liquid of the blood, with cells removed.

I'm curious about the concentration of blood cells AND electrolytes in the "plasma solvent". Has anyone seen information on this?
 
Biology news on Phys.org


In what units do you want blood cells concentration? Electrolytes are listed as molarity oir equivalents, these don't make much sense for erythrocytes or white blood cells.
 


Borek said:
In what units do you want blood cells concentration? Electrolytes are listed as molarity oir equivalents, these don't make much sense for erythrocytes or white blood cells.

I suppose units of cells/liter, or gram/liter.

I gave blood recently and I'm curious how that would affect my whole body's blood concentrations, the rate of recovery, and the amount of food energy required to make that recovery. I suspected that my cardiovascular performance was affected 24 hours later, but I want to see if there's a basis for that suspicion.
 


Back of the envelope approach would be that you have around 5L of blood, assuming you donated 0.4 L and blood was immediately diluted back to 5L, new concentrations would be \frac{5-0.4}{5}=0.92 or 92% of the original. But it doesn't work this way - I suppose electrolytes are replaced almost instantly, as their concentration (just like pH) must be kept in a very narrow range. However, erythrocytes need weeks to be replenished and their amount is variable, so the 92% number can be reasonably accurate.
 


Borek said:
Back of the envelope approach would be that you have around 5L of blood, assuming you donated 0.4 L and blood was immediately diluted back to 5L, new concentrations would be \frac{5-0.4}{5}=0.92 or 92% of the original. But it doesn't work this way - I suppose electrolytes are replaced almost instantly, as their concentration (just like pH) must be kept in a very narrow range. However, erythrocytes need weeks to be replenished and their amount is variable, so the 92% number can be reasonably accurate.

Do you know about the energy required to replenish? I assume we'd calculate the concentration of erythrocytes and other molecules the body produces, then calculate the enthalpy of formation for the total cell growth, then figure out the conversion factor to attain that amount of energy from chemical energy of food.

I'm not sure how to calculate these things, though.
 


You don't need concentrations, you can easily calculate number of erythrocytes. And I doubt anyone will calculate "enthalpy of formation" for a cell. They are not identical.
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Back
Top