Total phase difference diffraction help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the total phase difference in diffraction, specifically why the phase angle for the diffracted wave is represented as -k'*r while the incoming wave is k*r. The confusion arises from the geometric interpretation of the phase difference and the application of vector relations. Clarification is provided through the concept of the dot product in vector analysis, which explains the presence of the negative sign. Ultimately, the participant gains clarity on the topic after considering the vector perspective. This highlights the importance of visualizing diffraction phenomena in terms of vectors to grasp phase relationships.
PhysicsGirl90
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

I'm having some trouble comprehending the following image. I am supposed to be able to deduce from the figure that the total difference in phase angle is (k-k')r. To begin with, I do not understand why for the diffracted wave the difference in phase angle is -k'*r while for the incomming wave it is just k*r. Where does the minus sign come from?

Thanks in advance...
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0283.jpg
    IMAG0283.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 511
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm. The picture is a geometric way of showing what is going on and the equation is a way to show it as a vector relation.

So you need to think of the picture in terms of vectors, keeping in mind the definition of the dot product, then you'll see where the minus comes from.
 
Thanks Bruce, with your hints about the vectors I finally understood where everything comes from.
 
That's good. You did the work, I just gave you a kick in the right direction ;)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top