Total Transmission Across Finite Barrier Potential with E>V

Dahaka14
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A beam of electrons of KE = 100 eV is incident from the left on a barrier
which is 200 eV high and 10 nm wide. If the momentum spread is sufficiently
narrow, then a simple plane wave is a good approximation. Recall that the mass of an
electron is mc2 = 511 keV.

....._____
...1...|..2...|...3
__________|...|____________
.....x=0...x=10 nm

(periods are there to preserve picture upon post)

If the energy of the electrons is raised to 350 eV, what thickness should the barrier be
to give transmission with no reflections?

Homework Equations



T=|t|^2= \frac{1}{1+\frac{V_0^2\sin^2(k_1 a)}{4E(E-V_0)}}

where k_1=\sqrt{2m (V_0-E)/\hbar^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



I am almost positive I just use the above equation, set T=1, then solve for a because we know every other variable. I ended up with the general equation (no substitution for values yet)

1=\frac{1}{1+\frac{V_0^2\sin^2(k_1 a)}{4E(E-V_0)}}\iff 1=1+\frac{V_0^2\sin^2(k_1 a)}{4E(E-V_0)}\iff 0=\frac{V_0^2\sin^2(k_1 a)}{4E(E-V_0)}\iff 0=\sin^2(k_1 a)\iff n\pi=\sqrt{2m (V_0-E)/\hbar^{2}}a
\iff a=\frac{n\pi}{\sqrt{2m (V_0-E)/\hbar^{2}}}.

This solution makes me uneasy for some reason. Can someone point me out if I am wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sounds reasonable, though i haven't checked your transmission equation - the transmssion condition will be when the probability waves add up constructively on transission & 100% destructively on releflection

so check this means 0 reflection..

also think about what this means for the wave number k1 (1/wavelength effectively) vs the length of the barrier...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top