Train Whistle Echo: Calculating Distance & Temperature Effects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance to a reflecting surface based on the time it takes for a train engineer to hear an echo from a stationary railroad whistle. The engineer hears the echo 4.0 seconds later, leading to a calculated distance of 686 meters using the speed of sound at 343 m/s. Participants also discuss how an increase in air temperature affects the speed of sound, noting that higher temperatures result in faster sound transmission. A reference link is provided to support this claim about temperature's effect on sound speed. Understanding these principles is essential for accurately solving similar problems in physics.
Xoloti
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a)a stationary railroad whistle is sounded. An echo is heard 4.0 seconds later by a train's engineer. If the speed of sound is 343 m/s, how far away is the reflecting surface?
b) If the temperature of the air increased, how would this change your answer?

Homework Equations


d=rt
x=xt/2

The Attempt at a Solution


I got part a right. x=(343*4)/2 =686 because the sound has to travel twice
I do not know part b
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xoloti said:

Homework Statement


a)a stationary railroad whistle is sounded. An echo is heard 4.0 seconds later by a train's engineer. If the speed of sound is 343 m/s, how far away is the reflecting surface?
b) If the temperature of the air increased, how would this change your answer?

Homework Equations


d=rt
x=xt/2

The Attempt at a Solution


I got part a right. x=(343*4)/2 =686 because the sound has to travel twice
I do not know part b
Welcome to the PF.

How does the speed of sound in air change with a change in air temperature? :smile:
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF.

How does the speed of sound in air change with a change in air temperature? :smile:
Higher the temperature faster the speed of sound. Thanks!
 
Xoloti said:
Higher the temperature faster the speed of sound. Thanks!
Really? That may be true, but it's counter-intuitive for me. Do you have a link to a reference that says that? :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top