builder_user
- 196
- 0
Аh! I see.
gneill said:Didn't the phasor result have a angle?
I forgot formula for amplitude. arcsin(x)=f <- phase
gneill said:Didn't the phasor result have a angle?
gneill said:In the 'after commutation' circuit, immediately after the switch opens the capacitor will have a voltage on it that will want to discharge through the resistors R3 and R4. After a long time, the capacitor should look like an open circuit, not a sort circuit.
gneill said:The circuit on the left looks fine for a long time after commutation. Note that there will be no current through R4.
For the circuit on the right, representing the instant immediately after commutation, if the capacitor had zero voltage on it from before, then the circuit is correct.
builder_user said:Really?Great!
But if before commutation Uc was !=0 so It would look like long time or not?
gneill said:If Uc != 0 at commutation, then you would have to deal with that "initial" voltage in the "new" circuit.
One way to do that is to replace the charged capacitor with an equivalent circuit that behaves in the same manner. This would be comprised of the same capacitor, but uncharged, in series with a voltage source equal in value to the Uc value. You can then treat this new circuit as you would any other: in the instant after commutation the uncharged capacitor looks like a short circuit and the new voltage source will remain. This should allow you to find initial circuit conditions such as initial voltages and currents.
.
builder_user said:You mean that immediately it will be look like pic.1? But I can use Laplace replace