Tricky Torque Problem: Solving for Tension and Understanding Beam Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arooj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a torque problem involving a massless beam, where the net force and net torque must equal zero. Participants clarify that the tension (T) in the beam can be determined by applying equilibrium conditions, leading to the equation 980 = sin 37 T. The conversation emphasizes understanding the forces acting on the beam, including the force exerted by the wall, which creates compression. It is noted that the net force must balance out, with forces acting in opposing directions to achieve equilibrium. The importance of separating x and y components of force to analyze the system is also highlighted.
Arooj
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


65zm9i.jpg


The writing was just my reasoning, which I don't think is right.
Assume the beam is massless.

Homework Equations


T = Fd sin θ
F = mg
net force must be zero.
net torque must be zero.

The Attempt at a Solution


d * 1/2F + 980 = d * (sin 37) T
1/2 F + 980 = (sin 37) T
I don't know what to do from here.
I can mathematically solve the problem to an extent, but conceptually I don't understand how to do the problem. Can someone explain to me how to do the problem from scratch and the reasoning for steps (like what forces are acting on the beam)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arooj said:
d * 1/2F + 980 = d * (sin 37) T
1/2 F + 980 = (sin 37) T
What's F? I thought the beam was massless.

To solve this sort of problem, apply the conditions for equilibrium. The net torque = 0 is one of them. What are the others?
 
ah, so there is no F, meaning it would just be 980 = sin 37 T, where T is the tension.
net force = zero, forces left = forces right, forces up = forces down, clockwise torques = counterclockwise torques, x and y components of force may separately be set to 0. And T cos 37 would give the force exerted by the wall, I assume?
 
Arooj said:
ah, so there is no F, meaning it would just be 980 = sin 37 T, where T is the tension.
Right.
net force = zero, forces left = forces right, forces up = forces down, clockwise torques = counterclockwise torques, x and y components of force may separately be set to 0. And T cos 37 would give the force exerted by the wall, I assume?
Exactly.
 
And compression would thus be opposite to the force exerted by the wall, for a net force of zero?
 
Arooj said:
And compression would thus be opposite to the force exerted by the wall, for a net force of zero?
Yes, the net force is zero. The force exerted by the wall is the compression.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Back
Top