Trig substitution into integrals

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the use of trigonometric substitution for evaluating the convergence of the series ∑1/(n^2 - 1) from n=3 to infinity. The original poster questions the validity of substituting n with 2sin(u) when the upper bound approaches infinity, leading to concerns about the sine function's range. It is clarified that the substitution can still be made by evaluating the integral from 3 to a finite limit b and then taking the limit as b approaches infinity. However, participants suggest that using partial fractions is a more straightforward and effective method for this integral. The consensus is that while trigonometric substitution is possible, partial fractions are preferred for this specific case.
tadf2
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was testing for convergence of a series:
∑\frac{1}{n^2 -1} from n=3 to infinity

I used the integral test, substituting n as 2sin(u)

so here's the question:
when using the trig substitution, I realized the upperbound, infinity, would fit inside the sine.

Is it still possible to make the substitution? Or is there a restriction when this happens?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
tadf2 said:
I was testing for convergence of a series:
∑\frac{1}{n^2 -1} from n=3 to infinity

I used the integral test, substituting n as 2sin(u)

so here's the question:
when using the trig substitution, I realized the upperbound, infinity, would fit inside the sine.
What does "fit inside the sine" mean?
tadf2 said:
Is it still possible to make the substitution? Or is there a restriction when this happens?
Sure, you can make the substitution. The integral will be from 3 to, say b, and you take the limit as b → ∞.

Not that you asked, but it's probably simpler and quicker to break up 1/(n2 - 1) using partial fractions.
 
Inside the sine meaning, the argument of the 'arcsine' would only range from -1 to 1.
So I'm guessing you can't make the substitution because arcsin(infinity) = error?
 
If you're looking for an appropriate trig substitution for the definite integral (and not just one that gets you a correct antidierivative), then ##\sec u## is the way to go. But like Mark44 said, partial fractions is really the "right" technique of integration for this particular integral.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top