Triple integral volume problem, volume between 2 paraboloids

zonedestruct
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the volume of the solid region E bounded by the paraboloids z = 1+x^2+y^2 and
z = 4 - 2x^2 - 11y^2





The Attempt at a Solution


i set up a triple integral using Cartesian coordinates but was unable to solve it because the limits of integration where very hard to integrate, i don't think you can use cylindrical coordinates because the intersection is an eclipse: x^2 + 4y^2 = 1. PLease somebody show me a good method to do this question as it was in a past exam and might come up again.

Please help me. thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Know what, I didn't do it all but doesn't look like the regular way would be too hard.
4\mathop\iint\limits_{\text{1/4 my ellipse}} \left(z_1(x,y)-z_2(x,y)\right) dydx

and since you have the equation of the ellipse:

x^2+4y^2=1

not hard to get the upper limit on y right? Then x just goes from one side to the other.

What happens when you do that?
 
jackmell said:
Know what, I didn't do it all but doesn't look like the regular way would be too hard.
4\mathop\iint\limits_{\text{1/4 my ellipse}} \left(z_1(x,y)-z_2(x,y)\right) dydx

and since you have the equation of the ellipse:

x^2+4y^2=1

not hard to get the upper limit on y right? Then x just goes from one side to the other.

What happens when you do that?

is the limits for y: 0<= y < = (√(1-x^2))/2 ?? and then for x it is 0<=x<=1
 
Yes.
 
thanks jackmell i really like how you split it up to a quarter and multiplied by 4 to take advantage of the symmetry. NOw the integral is not as complicated as the one i initially had when i went from -(√(1-x^2))/2 <= y <= (√(1-x^2))/2
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top