Trouble with Log Laws and exponential functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two math questions involving logarithmic and exponential functions. For Question 1, participants clarify that the equation y = 0.771x + 1.609 can be rearranged to the form lny = mx + lnA, and they discuss how to isolate y by applying exponential functions. In Question 2, the focus is on the ages of two bones based on their C-14 content, leading to simultaneous equations that participants attempt to solve. The conversation emphasizes the need to eliminate variables and manipulate equations correctly to find relationships between the variables. Ultimately, it is concluded that only the difference between the ages can be determined, not their exact values.
pdas
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Please help i have these two questions and i am Stuck!
Question 1
The linear equation you have found (y=.771x+1.609) is in the form of y= mx +c. it should be however more appropreiatly be considered as being in the form, lny = mx + lnA. by using appropriat logarithmic and exponential laws rearange your equation (y=.771x+1.609) to make y the subject

I have no idea where to start with this Question.


Question 2
Bones A and B are x and y thousand years old respectivly. a Geiger Counter Confirms that bone A contains 3 Times as much C-14 as Bone be What can be Said about the ages of Bones A and B. The exponential equation that is given for the c-14 decay rate is a=15.3 x 0.886^t

i Have a feeling Question 2 has something to do with similtanious equations and i have gathered this so far.
3a = 15.3x0.883^x......A
a = 15.3x0.886^y......B

thanks you any help is very much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi pdas! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
pdas said:
… rearange your equation (y=.771x+1.609) to make y the subject

i don't understand :redface: … y is the subject of y = 0.771x + 1.609 :confused:
i Have a feeling Question 2 has something to do with similtanious equations and i have gathered this so far.
3a = 15.3x0.883^x......A
a = 15.3x0.886^y......B

That's right :smile:

and when you have two simultaneous equations, combine them into one equation, with y on the left and x on the right :wink:
 
i think it means make y the subject in the lny = mx + lnA equation ie get rid of the natural logs but i am not sure on how to do it??

is there any chance that you could help me a bit more with question two I am not sure how to continue i have made equation A into
log(a/15.3)/log0.886 = y is this right??
 
Last edited:
I was looking at it a tried to do it this way is this right??
a = 15.3x0.886^(log(a/15.3)/log0.886) but then how do i continue to solve??
 
hi pdas! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
pdas said:
i think it means make y the subject in the lny = mx + lnA equation

oh i see!

ok, do e-to-the on both sides (so the LHS becomes elny, which is y) :wink:
pdas said:
3a = 15.3x0.883^x......A
a = 15.3x0.886^y......B

you need to eliminate "a" from those two equations …

so divide one by the other! :smile:
 
ok Question 1 makes sense now.

i think my brain just clicked :)
So if i divide the 2 equations i get
3=x-y
then make it x=3+y
then divide it the other way around so u get
1/3= y-x
1/3=y-(3-y)

but then where do i go?
 
Last edited:
pdas said:
So if i divide the 2 equations i get
3=x-y

no, you don't!

write it out carefully, then divide
 
i remember now keep the base take the indices
so is it 3=.886^(x-y)?

then log3/log.886=(x-y)?


and after an hour of looking at question 1 again i am lost i get the e^(lny)=mx + but i don't see how lnA is related to c?? is c = ln A??

thank you so much for helping me !
 
Last edited:
pdas said:
i remember now keep the base take the indices
so is it 3=.886^(x-y)?

then log3/log.886=(x-y)?

:biggrin: Woohoo! :biggrin:
and after an hour of looking at question 1 again i am lost i get the e^(lny)=mx + but i don't see how lnA is related to c?? is c = ln A??

you must write everything out fully!

not because the examiner needs to see it, but because you need to see it! :rolleyes:

ok, in full:

lny = mx + lnA,

so elny = emx + lnA

so elny = emxelnA

so … ? :smile:
 
  • #10
so y = e^mx.e^lnA

then with Question 2 is it then true that you can only find the difference between the two values? not the values them selfs?
 
  • #11
hi pdas! :smile:

(just got up :zzz: …)
pdas said:
so y = e^mx.e^lnA

(please use the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

that's still not finished :rolleyes:

simplify it some more :smile:

then with Question 2 is it then true that you can only find the difference between the two values? not the values them selfs?

("themselves" :wink:)

yup! :biggrin:
 
Back
Top