B Trying to understand hydrostatic pressure with different vessel widths

AI Thread Summary
Hydrostatic pressure remains consistent across vessels of different diameters, such as 1 meter and 1 centimeter, due to the principle that pressure is determined by the weight of the liquid column above, not the cross-sectional area. Even with extreme reductions in diameter, such as 1 millimeter or smaller, the pressure at a given depth remains the same. While the total weight of water in larger pipes increases, the pressure distribution does not change. At atomic scales, however, the behavior of pressure may differ due to specific atomic properties, complicating the analysis. Overall, for standard vessel sizes, hydrostatic pressure is uniform regardless of diameter.
abrek
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
hydraulic pressure at minimum pipe diameter
2024_08_24_0xi_Kleki.png


will the hydrostatic pressure be the same on the vessels shown with a different diameter of 1 meter and 1 centimeter? and will it be the same in both vessels if the first pipe has a diameter even less than 1 millimeter, 1 thousandth of a millimeter, 1 atom?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Same pressure. PSI = pounds per square inch. Regardless of the pipe diameter, you can think of the weight of a thin vertical column of liquid. If you double the cross sectional area of that column, you also double the weight, so the change cancels out.
 
When you get down to atomic distance scales these rules are likely to break down. But the answer will depend on a lot of specific things, like which sort of atoms, etc. There's no simple answer in the nanoscale cases.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost, russ_watters, erobz and 1 other person
abrek said:
will the hydrostatic pressure be the same on the vessels shown with a different diameter of 1 meter and 1 centimeter?
As already covered by @DaveE the answer is yes. The weights of the two water pipes will be different (more water total means a heavier pipe+water combination), but the pressure distributions will be the same.
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top