Tube lemma generalization proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Tube
radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,148
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Let A and B be compact subspaces of X and Y, respectively. Let N be an open set in X x Y containing A x B. One needs to show that there exist open sets U in X and V in Y such that A x B \subseteq U x V \subseteq N.

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's my try:

First of all, since N is open, it can be written as a union of basis elements in X x Y, i.e. let N = \cup U_{i} \times V_{i}.

Then we cover A x B with basis elements contained in N, so that A \times B \subseteq \cup U_{i}' \times V_{i}'. Since A and B are compact, so is A x B, and for this cover, we have a finite subcover, so that A \times B \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n U_{i}' \times V_{i}'.

Now we have the following relation:

A \times B \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n U_{i}' \times V_{i}' \subseteq \cup U_{i} \times V_{i} = N.

Now, I'm not sure if this relation holds:

\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \times V_{i}') \cap (\cup U_{i} \times V_{i}) \subseteq \cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i})) \times \cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i})) \subseteq N. If it does, then U = \cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i})) and V = \cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i})) are the sets we were looking for.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If x = (a, b) is in (\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \times V_{i}')) \cap (\cup U_{i} \times V_{i}) then a is in Ui, b is in Vi, for some i, and a is in Ui' and b is in Vi'. So, a is in the intersection of Ui and Ui', for some i, and b is in the intersection of Vi and Vi', for some i, i.e. in their unions, so a is in (\cup_{i=1}^n (U_{i}' \cap (\cup U_{i}))) \times (\cup_{i=1}^n (V_{i}' \cap (\cup V_{i}))).

Any comments?

Edit: just corrected some LaTeX errors and added some brackets, now it should be OK.
 
Last edited:
Still no ideas? I'd like to know if this is correct, so I can finalize the exercise section I'm working on.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top