Tungsten Battery Anode: Charge & Experiments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on experimenting with tungsten and copper in saltwater batteries, particularly focusing on their redox potentials and temperature effects. Initial hypotheses about charging at high temperatures and discharging at low temperatures were challenged, with insights suggesting that temperature does not alter the order of oxidation and reduction potentials. The Nernst equation was referenced to explain the temperature dependence of electrochemical potential. Practical experiments revealed that tungsten acted as the cathode in a saltwater battery, yielding a voltage of -0.33 volts, while subsequent tests with a lye/peroxide solution produced a voltage of 0.45 volts. Overall, the experiments provided valuable insights into the behavior of copper oxidation and reduction in different setups.
Skyland
Messages
23
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Not sure if this belongs here
Does anyone know if a tungsten-/copper+ saltwater battery have any significant charge if any? Willing to experiment myself, but don't want to waste money without asking first
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Looking at standard redox potentials is always a good starting point.
 
I was reading that tungsten's redox potential was influenced by temperature and was wanting to see if you could charge the battery at high temperature to charge the tungsten with electrons, then discharge the battery at a lower temperature, and was wondering what the cheapest electrolyte/cathode would be to start experimenting with this hypothesis, is there a list of standard redox potentials by electrolyte or paired metals floating around? I'm definitely a learn by doing individual, I just wanted to know where to start the experiment.

Edit: now that I have watched a video on standard redox potential, I'm going to do some pen and paper calculations and potentially ask you to correct any misguided thinking
 
Last edited:
USER_SCOPED_TEMP_DATA_orca-image-1892830417.jpeg
USER_SCOPED_TEMP_DATA_orca-image--1736434245.jpeg


From what I learned the potential of a Copper tungsten cell of is 0.457v, did I do the math right? or no? also believe my previous hypothesis is incorrect, as tungsten's oxidation potential would be increased at higher temperatures and it's reduction potential would be increased at lower temperatures, meaning I'd have to now reverse my experiment. Charge @ lower temperatures and discharge @ higher temperatures. Which doesn't make sense in any practical application.
 
Skyland said:
View attachment 258206View attachment 258207

From what I learned the potential of a Copper tungsten cell of is 0.457v, did I do the math right? or no? also believe my previous hypothesis is incorrect, as tungsten's oxidation potential would be increased at higher temperatures and it's reduction potential would be increased at lower temperatures, meaning I'd have to now reverse my experiment. Charge @ lower temperatures and discharge @ higher temperatures. Which doesn't make sense in any practical application.
This isn't right. Why do you think tungsten's oxidation and reduction potentials are different? It's just one or the other direction for the reaction. The temperature dependence of electrochemical potential is given by the Nernst equation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nernst_equation
To a very good approximation, changing the temperature should not change the order of the redox potentials.

(There may be secondary effects for highly non-ideal solutions that dramatically change the chemical activity of the species at different temperatures--making the notion of charging a battery by changing the temperature a really fascinating idea--but this would be at least a Ph.D. project unto itself.)
 
I did not think the the temperature would change whether the tungsten would be oxidized or reduced, I thought it would change the voltage potential, and I wanted to see if charging the battery at a higher temperature, and discharging it at a lower temper would have effects on the battery overall output, but, like it's been pointed out to me I should just be focused on learning the basics, so once my tungsten rods and copper pipe arrived, I made a salt water battery, and learned very quickly that my thoughts on the battery were wrong, with the common on tungsten the multi meter read -0.33 volts dc, which meant in a salt water battery the tungsten is the cathode, I was confused at first because my understanding of the table meant, I had sodium hydroxide and peroxide on hand, and I knew that a even dilute mixture would disolve copper, so I made another setup with the lye/peroxide solution, this time with common on tungsten the multimeter read 0.45 volts, very close to my original math, however the copper although it was being reduced, still oxidized, and black copper oxide precipitated into solution and blue copper hydroxide formed on the outside of the pipe which was different on the other battery because I had formed green copper oxide on the inside of the pipe being oxidized. ( Yes I realize that didn't need to be one sentence, if you met me you'd be annoyed cause I also talk like that) It was cool to see how diffrently the copper oxidized in each test and I was glad I learned a key piece of information on reduction and oxidation in Batteries.
USER_SCOPED_TEMP_DATA_orca-image--1308766239.jpeg
USER_SCOPED_TEMP_DATA_orca-image--72998147.jpeg
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top