Tunneling through step potential

frankcastle
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey, I found this interesting case in the tunneling problem.
How do we calculate the transmission probability when the
energy of the approaching particle is equal to the height of the potential barrier?

I.e E=Vo.


Homework Equations



Same equations as in other cases for x<0.

The Attempt at a Solution


How does the particle behave in the potential step region?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can we calculate like the other problem of the potential barrier .E=V so after calculating Hamiltonian operator on wave function in part 1 we have Φ_1=Aexp(ikx)+Bexp(-ikx) and part 2 :Φ_2=0? and we can calculate A and B.
 
The solution for part 1 makes sense, but why must the wave function be zero in the square potential region? If tunneling is possible for E<V then transmission must occur for E=V too I think
 
I got what was my mistake! :-)
General solutions are Φ_1=Aexp(ikx)+Bexp(-ikx) and Φ_2=Cexp(iqx)+Dexp(-iqx)
as we know k^2=2mE(4pi^2)/h^2 and q=2mE(E-V)(4pi^2)/h^2
so Φ_2=C+D (transmission is constant)it makes sense,doesn't it?;-)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top