Two-block system - what am I doing wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bensky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a two-block system involving forces such as tension, friction, and weight. The original poster is attempting to solve for the acceleration of the blocks, expressing confusion over their calculations and assumptions regarding the forces acting on the blocks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions their assumption that tension and acceleration are the same for both blocks. They express concern over discrepancies in their calculated acceleration compared to the expected value.
  • Participants inquire about the meaning and role of various terms in the equations, particularly the weight term and its components.
  • Some participants suggest reconsidering the inclusion of certain forces in the equations, such as the normal force and the x-component of gravity.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the roles of different forces and terms in the equations. There is a mix of agreement and differing interpretations regarding the setup of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct application of forces, and the original poster indicates progress in understanding after receiving feedback.

Contextual Notes

The original poster has provided an attachment with their work and diagram, which is referenced throughout the discussion. There is an emphasis on ensuring consistency in the coordinate system used for analysis.

Bensky
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Two-block system -- what am I doing wrong? :(

Homework Statement


See attempt at solution.

Homework Equations


f_k = u_k * N (force of kinetic friction)
W = mg (weight on the blocks)
F_net = ma (net force)

T is the tension force.

The Attempt at a Solution


See attachment. It contains all my work, and the diagram for the problem. Was I correct in assuming both T and a_x for both blocks are the same?

The answer should be 0.98 m/s^2 for the acceleration but I get 5.88 m/s^2. What am I doing wrong?
 

Attachments

  • attemptedsolution.jpg
    attemptedsolution.jpg
    58.1 KB · Views: 431
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Are you looking for someone to tell you you're correct, or is your solution wrong?
 


CaptainEvil said:
Are you looking for someone to tell you you're correct, or is your solution wrong?

My solution is wrong. The answer I got is ~5 m/s^2 for the acceleration while I should be getting 0.98 m/s^2 for the acceleration.
 


What is the W term in your Fx B eqn?
 


CaptainEvil said:
What is the W term in your Fx B eqn?

mg*sin(36.87 degrees)
 


What does it represent? It's not Tension, it's not Friction...
 


CaptainEvil said:
What does it represent? It's not Tension, it's not Friction...

Weight on the block B, sorry if I forgot to include that, edited my post.
 


As far as I can tell your math is good, but I don't think you need this 'weight' term in Fnetx B. Your terms in Fnetx B should be Tension - Friction - xcomponent of Gravity
 


You made two mistakes on B. They are 1.the direction of Tension, and 2.you shouldn't have N_{B} in the x direction.
 
  • #10


CaptainEvil said:
As far as I can tell your math is good, but I don't think you need this 'weight' term in Fnetx B. Your terms in Fnetx B should be Tension - Friction - xcomponent of Gravity

To be clear, I meant W is the x-component of the weight of Block B, NOT the total weight of block B. I probably should have written it as W_x.

I'm not sure what you mean by x component of gravity...? How is this determined?
 
  • #11


No your Tension looks like the right sign, but if your W is the 'x component of gravity' term then that needs to be positive, since it's directing your block to the right.

There is no x component of a Normal force so leave out N.

Keep note that your coordinate system doesn't matter, but you need to be consistent
 
  • #12


your meaning of x component of weight of block B seems to be the same as my meaning of x component of gravity. Gravity is dragging the block down the ramp, but not at the rate mg, it is damped by a factor of sin(theta) of which you have written down correctly.

N should not be there
 
  • #13


benhou said:
You made two mistakes on B. They are 1.the direction of Tension, and 2.you shouldn't have N_{B} in the x direction.

The reason I had N_B in the x direction is because f_k (kinetic friction force) = u_k * N_B. I think that I should have this in the x direction since friction exists in this problem. Please correct me if I'm wrong or tell me where it should be.

EDIT: Nevermind! I see where I put that in there, thank you! Will try again and see how this works.
 
  • #14


CaptainEvil said:
No your Tension looks like the right sign, but if your W is the 'x component of gravity' term then that needs to be positive, since it's directing your block to the right.

There is no x component of a Normal force so leave out N.

Keep note that your coordinate system doesn't matter, but you need to be consistent

The string is pulling the block B back, therefore negative, x component of force of gravity is pointing to the right, therefore positive. Both of these should be switched.
 
  • #15


Yes, you should have Frictional force acting in the x direction = u_k * N_B

However, your leading term: N_B which stands by itself should not be there.

N_B is the force that the ramp exerts on the block, and while it is an important term in determining the frictional force, it in itself does not contribute to the acceleration of the block

Good luck!
 
  • #16


benhou said:
The string is pulling the block B back, therefore negative, x component of force of gravity is pointing to the right, therefore positive. Both of these should be switched.

Thank you, this makes perfect sense and I am now getting the correct answer. I don't know why I didn't see that.

Also thanks to CaptainEvil for pointing out that I included N_B in front where it should not be there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K