Two blocks on a surface and a pulley

AI Thread Summary
A block A moves upwards on a surface while block B remains stationary relative to the surface due to the forces acting on both blocks. If A moves downwards, B would experience unbalanced forces from friction and gravity, causing it to accelerate down the slope. The direction of A's motion is crucial to ensure that both blocks maintain their respective positions. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the forces at play, including friction, gravity, and normal forces. Ultimately, A's upward motion is necessary to prevent B from moving relative to the incline.
Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-22_16-51-53.png

Everything that can be used is in the picture.
μ is the coefficient of friction between both B and A and A and the surface.
A is moving upwards the surface with a certain acceleration.
B doesn't move in relative to the surface.
1. Why the direction of A's motion must be upwards and not downwards for B to not move in relative to the surface.
2. tanα=?

Homework Equations


ma=F

The Attempt at a Solution


I really don't know why A has to move upwards for this to be possible. If it move upwards both B and the surafce will apply force to the same dircetion (downwards the surface), but if it moves downwards they will both apply force upwards the surface. Why does it matter?
I thought that if I solved 2 maybe I would understand, however I can't seem to solve it.
I tried to draw a free body diagram, because if we want A to not move in relative to B we need them to have the same acceleration (in this case at least, correct?)
However, I have no idea how to draw the axes.
Any help would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-22_16-51-53.png
    upload_2017-12-22_16-51-53.png
    19.2 KB · Views: 742
Physics news on Phys.org
Eitan Levy said:
if we want A to not move in relative to B
As I understand it, A does move relative to B. But B does not move relative to the incline.
 
Think about all the forces on B in either case.
 
TSny said:
As I understand it, A does move relative to B. But B does not move relative to the incline.
I just can't type...
 
Merlin3189 said:
Think about all the forces on B in either case.
Friction, gravity and normal (the friction swaps its direction),
Still don't understand why it's impossible.

Maybe it's because at the second case B will accelerate downwards the sufrace for sure? And the surface can't accelerate the same way, so B will have to move in relative to it?
 
Eitan Levy said:
Maybe it's because at the second case B will accelerate downwards the sufrace for sure?
Yes. If B were to stay put while A moves downplane underneath it then both friction and gravity would be acting down the slope on B, with nothing to balance them.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top