Accelerations of Boxes on a Horizontal Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter sci-doo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accelerating
AI Thread Summary
When box 1 is pushed with a force F, it slides on box 2 due to kinetic friction, which is represented by the equation Fk=ukN. The acceleration of box 1 is calculated as a=(F-ukN)/m_box1. Box 2 experiences a reaction force from the friction between the two boxes, but the frictional force acting on box 2 is greater than that on box 1, leading to the conclusion that box 2 does not move. The discussion highlights that the kinetic friction acting on box 2 is sufficient to prevent its movement, resulting in zero acceleration for box 2. Thus, the overall analysis suggests that box 2 remains stationary while box 1 slides on top of it.
sci-doo
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Box 1 is placed on box 2, which sits on the floor. Kinetic friction constant between the boxes, and the box 2 and the floor, is equal u.

When box 1 is pushed with horizontal force F it starts to slide on box 2. At the same time, box 2 starts to move. What are the accelerations of the boxes.

Homework Equations


Kinetic friction Fk=ukN
F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


The top box (box 1):
Force that accelerates (pushing minus friction)
Fa=F-Fu=F-ukN
and the acceleration
a=\frac{F-u_{k}N}{m_{box1}}

The lower box (box 2):

By the Newtons 3rd law the force that pushes the box 2 is the reaction of kinetic friction Fu between the boxes, right? Now this is where I face the problem: as the friction between box 2 and floor is the same but the weight is more (box1+box2) I get negative acceleration ?!? :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the limiting cases: The second box on a frictionless surface, and the second box fastened to the surface such that this box cannot move.
 
Welcome to PF.

Your kinetic friction arises because it is moving relative to the box underneath.

Now Kinetic friction is a retarding force given by the μ *m*g relationship.

The maximum force then that Box 1 can transfer to box 2 is just that.

As you note though box 2 has a retarding force available of μ *(m + m) * g.

Since μ *(2m)*g will always be > μ *m*g then I have serious doubt that the bottom box moves despite the statement of the problem. So I'd say it's not negative acceleration, just 0 movement.
 
LowlyPion said:
Since μ *(2m)*g will always be > μ *m*g then I have serious doubt that the bottom box moves despite the statement of the problem. So I'd say it's not negative acceleration, just 0 movement.

Makes sense.

I don't see how it could move (especially to opposite direction)... I think it'd move (to positive drctn) only if the weight was <0 ...
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top