Solving Two Boxes & Friction Motion Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoeTrumpet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving two stacked boxes and their motion under friction. The key point is that the friend's method incorrectly assumes the applied force equals the static friction, leading to a flawed equation that does not account for the combined mass of both boxes. The correct approach involves calculating the net force by considering the maximum static friction and subtracting the kinetic friction acting on the lower box. This net force is then used to determine the acceleration of the system, which is essential for finding the time taken to move a distance of 4.0 m without the top box sliding. Understanding the correct application of forces and friction is crucial for solving this problem accurately.
JoeTrumpet
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
I understand how to get the question right, but my friend posed an alternate method that is wrong and I was wondering why his method doesn't work.

Homework Statement


The coefficient of static friction is 0.75 between two blocks stacked on one another. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Force F vector acting on the upper block to the right causes both blocks to cross a distance of 4.0 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which this motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block?

The upper box is 4kg and the lower box is 3kg.

Homework Equations


Upper box: Fxtotal = F - fs = m1*a (my guess is I made a mistake here since it wasn't pertinent to my solution)
Lower box: Fxtotal = fs - fk = m2*a

where a1 = a2 = a because of motion together.

Upper box: Fytotal = N = m1*g
Lower box: Fytotal = N = m1*g + m2*g

The Attempt at a Solution


I simply solved the lower equation for a and plugged it into the proper kinematic equation. However, my friend wrote from intuition F - fk = (m1 + m2)*a, which happens to be a combination of my two Fxtotal equations, and said that to maximize the distance F would have to equal fs, thus getting fs - fk = (m1 + m2)*a, which clearly would yield a response different from mine. I was wondering if anyone could clear up for us why it's wrong. I figure it has to either do with his assumption that F = fs or with my first equation and his overall equation (or both).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JoeTrumpet said:
I understand how to get the question right, but my friend posed an alternate method that is wrong and I was wondering why his method doesn't work.

Homework Statement


The coefficient of static friction is 0.75 between two blocks stacked on one another. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the lower block and the floor is 0.20. Force F vector acting on the upper block to the right causes both blocks to cross a distance of 4.0 m, starting from rest. What is the least amount of time in which this motion can be completed without the top block sliding on the lower block?

The upper box is 4kg and the lower box is 3kg.

Homework Equations


Upper box: Fxtotal = F - fs = m1*a (my guess is I made a mistake here since it wasn't pertinent to my solution)
Lower box: Fxtotal = fs - fk = m2*a

where a1 = a2 = a because of motion together.

Upper box: Fytotal = N = m1*g
Lower box: Fytotal = N = m1*g + m2*g

The Attempt at a Solution


I simply solved the lower equation for a and plugged it into the proper kinematic equation. However, my friend wrote from intuition F - fk = (m1 + m2)*a, which happens to be a combination of my two Fxtotal equations, and said that to maximize the distance F would have to equal fs, thus getting fs - fk = (m1 + m2)*a, which clearly would yield a response different from mine. I was wondering if anyone could clear up for us why it's wrong. I figure it has to either do with his assumption that F = fs or with my first equation and his overall equation (or both).

Thanks!

Your equation on the lower box overlooks that whatever acceleration there is must include the mass of both boxes.

The clearer way to view it for me is to look at what the maximum force may be applied. And that is simply .75*m1*g

From that you subtract the frictional force which is the combined weight times .2.

So the net force available then is .75*m1*g - .2*g*(m1 + m2)
That in turn equals the force available to accelerate the two boxes as a system, namely

.75*m1*g - .2*g*(m1 + m2) = a * (m1 + m2)

Then figure your time the usual way with kinematics.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top