Two infinite charged lines -- find the locations where E=0

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the locations where the electric field is zero between two infinite charged lines, one with a positive charge density of +1λ and the other with a negative charge density of -2λ. The electric field due to each line is described by the equation E = λ/(2πε₀r), leading to the equation λ1/r + λ2/(d-r) = 0 for equilibrium. By substituting λ2 with -2λ1, the problem simplifies to solving for the distance r in terms of the separation distance d. A visual representation of the electric field lines indicates that they flow from the positive to the negative line, confirming the need for careful consideration of charge interactions. The solution ultimately reveals specific locations where the electric field cancels out.
Grifter
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A very long (infinite), straight line of charge runs parallel to another very long (infinite) straight line of charge. Both lines are uniformly charged, one with +1*(lambda) and the other with -2*(lambda). The distance between them is d. Find (if any) the location(s) where the electric field is zero.

Homework Equations



[infinite wire] E = 1/(2(pi)(epsilon naught)) * (lambda)/r
[2 wires] E = (sigma1)(sigma2) / 2(epsilon naught)
sigma=area charge
lambda=line charge
epsilon naught=8.854e-12 C^2/N*m^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a picture with the positively charged line with E-lines flowing away and the negatively charged line with E-lines flowing in. Between the E-lines flow from positive to negative. Not sure about the relationship between lambda and sigma or how to use an equation to find E=0 with variable charges.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From a distance r from a wire of charge lenght-density λ (Coloumb per meter) the electric field strenght is proportional to λ/r

You want to solve the equation λ1/r + λ2/(d-r) = 0
Just use that λ2 = -2λ1 and solve for r in terms of d
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top