Two Leaning Sticks (Torque Calculation)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matt Raj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating torques for two leaning sticks, where the left stick's length is initially unknown. The user struggled to balance the torques and questioned how the solution derived the equation N = (Mg/2) sin θ without incorporating the length of the left stick. After some clarification, it was revealed that the left stick's length was described as infinitesimal, not infinite, which helped resolve confusion. The user ultimately solved the problem by determining the ratio r, but still sought clarity on the book's approach. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting problem statements and the relationships between forces and torques.
Matt Raj
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
One stick leans on another as shown in Fig. 2.21. A right angle is formed where they meet, and the right stick makes an angle θ with the horizontal. The left stick extends infinitesimally beyond the end of the right stick. The coefficient of friction between the two sticks is μ. The sticks have the same mass density per unit length and are both hinged at the ground. What is the minimum angle θ for which the sticks don’t fall? (From Introduction to Classical Mechanics by David Morin)
Relevant Equations
N = (Mg/2) sin θ
F_f = (mg/2)cosθ
I attempted this problem trying to balance torques but I couldn't because the length of the left stick is unknown. From the right stick I got that mg/2* cos θ = F_f but from the left stick I got that Mg/2sin θ =N* r where r is the ratio of the length of where the sticks meet and the total length of the left stick. I looked at the answer and it didn't involve any ratio as such; in fact, the equation from the left stick provided in the solution was N = (Mg/2) sin θ. I'm confused why the solution didn't incorporate the length of the stick for the normal force on the left stick. Besides that one equation, I can solve the rest of the problem.

Update: I solved the problem by finding r but I'd like to know how the book found the equation " N = (Mg/2) sin θ " whereas I got N*cot θ* l/L = Mgsin θ and had to do some extra work.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2019-07-21 at 5.58.55 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2019-07-21 at 5.58.55 AM.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 537
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Matt Raj said:
Update: I solved the problem by finding r but I'd like to know how the book found the equation " N = (Mg/2) sin θ " whereas I got N*cot θ* l/L = Mgsin θ and had to do some extra work.
What equation do you get if you set up the torque equation for the left stick with the origin at the lower end of the left stick?

(I'm not sure what l and L mean in your equation).
 
If the length of the large stick is L, by basic trig, the length of the short left stick is Ltan theta. Thus the weight of the long stick is mg, and the weight of the short stick is mg tan theta. Since half of the long sticks weight goes vertically to the joint, you can resolve it into it’s friction and normal force. Does that help? You must then solve for Theta. Without using numbers.
 
TSny said:
What equation do you get if you set up the torque equation for the left stick with the origin at the lower end of the left stick?

(I'm not sure what l and L mean in your equation).
"l" is the length of the right stick. I mistakenly assumed that the length of the left stick was "L" when the problem stated that it was infinite. There's a normal force from the right stick that should yield N= "the torque from the weight of the right stick", but how do you get the side of the equation for the weight as the length of the left stick is infinite?EDIT: Read the problem again, it said infinitesimally not infinitely like I assumed; thanks for your help
 
Matt Raj said:
"l" is the length of the right stick. I mistakenly assumed that the length of the left stick was "L" when the problem stated that it was infinite. There's a normal force from the right stick that should yield N= "the torque from the weight of the right stick", but how do you get the side of the equation for the weight as the length of the left stick is infinite?EDIT: Read the problem again, it said infinitesimally not infinitely like I assumed; thanks for your help
can we take torque around right hinge and equate it with torque of friction ? well it worked out pretty well for me.
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...