Two torqued and hanging constrained rods

  • Thread starter Thread starter pc100
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a mechanical system consisting of two massless rods connected by a revolute joint, with one end fixed to a wall via a pin joint, forming a double pendulum configuration. The presence of a torque between the rods complicates the motion of the two point masses, which are expected to rotate around a pseudo-center-of-mass. The user is struggling to derive the correct equations of motion due to the constraints imposed by the wall and the pin joint. They question how to define the constraint at the point where the second mass is connected, noting that it can slide in the plane but has no additional constraints. The challenge lies in accurately modeling the system's dynamics given the unique configuration and constraints.
pc100
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is a general situation that I'm trying to figure out. Say there are two massless rods connected with a revolute joint, and one of the rods' other free end is connected to the wall with a free pin joint. There are two point masses in the system (see attachment), so the system is in a double pendulum configuration.

Now a torque τ appears between the rods only. What are the equations describing the motion of the two masses?
There's no gravity (i.e. this is sideways in a plane, for example)

Intuitively both the bottom and top masses will rotate and displace around some pseudo-center-of-mass point (the green dot P?), and with different displacements. I drew this guess onto the figure as well.


Homework Equations



These are not correct:
τ = I(m2 about P)*α(m2)
where I(m2 about P) = m2 * r(b to P)^2
and
τ = I(m1 about P)*α(m1)
where I(m1 about P) = m1 * r(a to P)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is that the wall is causing some strange behavior of the system, and I don't know how to approach this in closed form due to the constraint of the wall... Hints?
 

Attachments

  • torqued rods.GIF
    torqued rods.GIF
    20.7 KB · Views: 514
Physics news on Phys.org
How exactly is the constraint at point b (mass m2) defined?
 
This is a planar mechanism with two revolute joints whose axes are parallel to each other, and perpendicular to the plane defined by the ground and rods. So this rod setup can swing and bend side to side in the plane of the drawing. The constraint in the setup is the pin joint on one end of Rod 1 that keeps the mechanism connected to the wall.
So point b can slide around in the plane of the drawing, but aside from that, it has no constraint. For example, if point 'a' were held in place, then point 'b' would orbit around point 'a' in the plane of the drawing.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top