Uncharged spherical conducting shell

AI Thread Summary
An uncharged spherical conducting shell surrounds a charge of -q at its center, and when a charge of +3q is placed outside the shell, the charges on the inner and outer surfaces become +q and -q, respectively. The +3q charge does not influence the total charge on the exterior surface but affects the distribution of charge on the shell. According to Gauss's Law, the electric field depends only on the charge enclosed, which in this case is -q. Thus, the outer charge does not alter the inner charge's effect on the shell. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing charge distribution in electrostatics.
VU2
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
An uncharged spherical conducting shell surrounds charge -q at the center of the shell. Then a charge+ +3q is placed on the outside of the shell. When static equilibrium is reached, the charges on the inner and outer surfaces of the she are respecteively... +q,-q is the answer.

Does the +3q charge play any roll in that answer? Help. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
VU2 said:
An uncharged spherical conducting shell surrounds charge -q at the center of the shell. Then a charge+ +3q is placed on the outside of the shell. When static equilibrium is reached, the charges on the inner and outer surfaces of the she are respecteively... +q,-q is the answer.

Does the +3q charge play any roll in that answer? Help. Thanks!

Do you know Gauss's Law ?
 
Yes, its E=q/[ε*area], where q is the charge enclosed.
 
VU2 said:
Yes, its E=q/[ε*area], where q is the charge enclosed.

That should give you your answer.
 
So +3q charge doesn't play any roll at all right?
 
VU2 said:
So +3q charge doesn't play any roll at all right?

That is correct, as far as the total charge on the exterior. However,the +3q does affect the distribution of that charge.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top