Programs Undergraduate degree to graduate degree in Nuclear Engineering

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the educational path for an undergraduate in electrical engineering who is considering pursuing a graduate degree in nuclear engineering. The individual is contemplating whether to switch majors to physics or mechanical engineering, given the lack of nuclear engineering programs in their state. Key points include the relevance of electrical engineering's power aspects to nuclear engineering, but the consensus suggests that physics or mechanical engineering may provide a stronger foundation. Mechanical engineering is highlighted as particularly beneficial due to its comprehensive coverage of essential topics like heat transfer, fluid dynamics, and thermodynamics, which are critical in nuclear engineering. Additionally, a solid understanding of material science and structural mechanics is emphasized as important for those interested in reactor design and operation. Overall, while an electrical engineering degree could lead to a nuclear engineering graduate program, transitioning to mechanical engineering is recommended for a more aligned educational background.
axmls
Education Advisor
Messages
942
Reaction score
395
I'm currently an undergraduate in electrical engineering. There aren't any nuclear engineering programs in my state, but I'm highly considering getting a graduate degree in nuclear engineering following my undergraduate degree, because it's very interesting to me. However, I'm wondering whether staying in electrical engineering would be the best option.

I'm only a freshman at the moment, so it wouldn't be too much of a problem to switch to another degree program. Would it be better for me if I switched my major to physics as a way to lead into a nuclear engineering program? As far as electrical engineering is concerned, I was thinking the power aspects of it would be helpful for nuclear engineering, but I'm not sure as to what extent.

What would prepare me better for a graduate degree in nuclear engineering: electrical engineering or physics? If neither, is there another branch of science or engineering that would be better than both, such as chemistry or chemical engineering?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably physics
 
I would suggest physics over electrical engineering if you are truly intending to do graduate school in nuclear engineering. However, it could be done with an electrical engineering degree. Depends on what kind of research you want to do in graduate school.
 
axmls said:
I'm currently an undergraduate in electrical engineering. There aren't any nuclear engineering programs in my state, but I'm highly considering getting a graduate degree in nuclear engineering following my undergraduate degree, because it's very interesting to me. However, I'm wondering whether staying in electrical engineering would be the best option.

I'm only a freshman at the moment, so it wouldn't be too much of a problem to switch to another degree program. Would it be better for me if I switched my major to physics as a way to lead into a nuclear engineering program? As far as electrical engineering is concerned, I was thinking the power aspects of it would be helpful for nuclear engineering, but I'm not sure as to what extent.

What would prepare me better for a graduate degree in nuclear engineering: electrical engineering or physics? If neither, is there another branch of science or engineering that would be better than both, such as chemistry or chemical engineering?

Physics or mechanical engineering are going to be closer to nuclear engineering than EE is. If you want to do power engineering than being an EE that focuses on power would do you some good but you'd miss a lot of the physics that's needed in NE.
 
axmls said:
I'm currently an undergraduate in electrical engineering. There aren't any nuclear engineering programs in my state, but I'm highly considering getting a graduate degree in nuclear engineering following my undergraduate degree, because it's very interesting to me. However, I'm wondering whether staying in electrical engineering would be the best option.

I'm only a freshman at the moment, so it wouldn't be too much of a problem to switch to another degree program. Would it be better for me if I switched my major to physics as a way to lead into a nuclear engineering program? As far as electrical engineering is concerned, I was thinking the power aspects of it would be helpful for nuclear engineering, but I'm not sure as to what extent.

What would prepare me better for a graduate degree in nuclear engineering: electrical engineering or physics? If neither, is there another branch of science or engineering that would be better than both, such as chemistry or chemical engineering?

If you switch to anything go with mechanical engineering. All of the physics you need will be covered in the curriculum. You don't need a physics degree to be a nuclear engineer. I'm a senior nuclear engineering student and while they loaded us up on physics courses a good bit of our curriculum consist of core classes from the mechanical engineering department. Just think about it you split atoms to generate heat energy which has to be removed from your reactor and turned to steam to generate electricity. That means you need knowledge in heat transfer and since the coolant and moderators are fluids that means you need knowledge of fluid dynamics. The steam is created in a steam generator which means you need knowledge of thermodynamic processes. These are all courses in the mechanical engineering department. Aside from that you also need knowledge in material science and engineering and some statics and strength of materials would be useful too if you're going into power plant design or just to understand how loads and stresses affect your reactor system. These are all mechanical engineering courses. Not to mention the reactor engineering course you won't get from a physics degree. Look it up most schools nuclear engineering degrees have a strong mechanical engineering core.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top