Understanding and Solving Vertical Structure Stress Equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving vertical structure stress equations, specifically addressing a homework problem related to stress being constant. A participant expresses confusion about the question, suggesting that the wording may need clarification to better understand the task. They propose that changing the request from determining stress to finding the radius at the top of a structure could simplify the problem. Additionally, they note the importance of having actual values for compressive strength and density of concrete to proceed effectively. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer problem statements and relevant data in structural analysis.
yui859126455
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://holland.pk/uptow/i4/4af070d190cc175e6ca5d326cd60cda2.png The attempt at a solution
the question have a possible solution? that equation is based on stress is constant, so how to use this equation to proof? i m a year 2 student. i can only solve part i
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/zh2i6XCfF7wF4N3qi67U6ul0qfoRAOisQKwq88wE24iAMWns4lr2ra469lf_vXVgUpkSmONlvkKvtZznGqKHYzNEAFRrOS2QUO2exMCnL6-fTeKLr4qqBFryXguY_maGmHqp98naMWtOoB_3p5WshkynZhkPjks6epP5blbL8rlBKs3lS-OrkY0x1CTaeG-KXEDMxLN7X0SBcZo3ny_iMRx1ffRyT0A5wu7QmZeVcVPcVfsSNGVxc-S216sOZWPrf72rAf_DhCDM4Eb8DFzLh1qTHjZ-74FsGUMb8Lq7fuB0tNfM4YZbVlUYVEqYAQYp8QPI6rajRBT0C3rb9qruvKk_l0-rtFG6nLUUqm22j6RZWHeSNkS3ldvplg-_1n4xlw6mP-kBCkQmVn09zulD34JWINZ4eAo9bv4ppZBoXxJbJWGnSi8CNAS0GG-7MfhwqwARfFyc695DupPTLTr5YTlYcmaECNyxsD6f56qD01bRgcOHTjqYkOCuXZNHU5wF2D7npMogEECccVOl0y8AJkqBHWoxQwEwXrzAAjT-YGL47QBPHKOuPTtT3KSpnkOKaTbc7CQ7kxnQEtovJ_i-xEzrJZzd5yIdPXGHn4hosIfNNIqS=w686-h914-no
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
help
 
help
 
help
 
I've been puzzling over this since you first posted the question . Part 2 does not make much sense as written .

It might make more sense if the wording ' Determine the stress at the top of H ' was changed to ' Determine the radius r at the the top of H ' and if you had actual values for the compressive strength and density of the concrete .

Finding the radius r would not actually be too difficult but our efforts might be wasted if our understanding of the question is wrong .

Sorry I can't be more helpful .
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top