Understanding Branch Cuts of Ln(x) for Integrating (x^2+1)^2 from 0 to Infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter barrybaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Branch
barrybaker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1.I am trying to evaluate the \int\frac{ln(x)}{(x^{2}+1)^{2}} from 0 to inf2. I think I am having problems defining what my branch cut should be.

3. Here is what I have tried to no avail. First set the branch cut from -infty to 0. Then changing it to a contour integral gives us (\int\frac{ln(x)}{(x^{2}+1)^{2}}) = 2 \pi i (a-1(i)+a-1(-i))=\frac{i \pi^{2}}{4}

I get somewhat lost after this. Please help. I'm studying for finals but i don't really understand this
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd use an upper half-washer with an indentation around the origin. The branch-cut can then be anywhere in the lower half-plane including on the real axis. Then consider the following contour integral:

\mathop\oint\limits_{W_u}\frac{\text{Log}(z)}{(1+z^2)^2} dz

Assuming you can show the integral goes to zero over both large and small semi-circles of the contour, we're left with:

\mathop\oint\limits_{W_u}\frac{\text{Log}(z)}{(1+z^2)^2} dz=2\int_0^{\infty}\frac{\ln(r)}{(1+r^2)^2}dr+\pi i\int_0^{\infty}\frac{1}{(1+r^2)^2}dr=2\pi i \frac{d}{dz} \frac{\log(z)}{(z+i)^2}\Bigg|_{z=i}

where I let z=r e^{0i} on the leg from 0 to \infty and z=re^{\pi i} on the leg from -\infty to 0 to arrive at that expression.
 
Thanks so much. I worked it out as you have laid it out and received the correct answer. but how did you know to put the contour only in the upper half plane?
 
barrybaker said:
Thanks so much. I worked it out as you have laid it out and received the correct answer. but how did you know to put the contour only in the upper half plane?

You could use the lower half-plane and adjust the analysis accordingly. You just have to work a bunch of them to gain experience to analyze it and try things and be willing to fail at it from time to time. Remember, good cooks try again after failing a recipe, bad ones give up. :)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top