Understanding Centripetal Force Lab Calculations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stevedye56
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Lab
AI Thread Summary
In the centripetal force lab, the actual centripetal force was calculated using the weight of the hanging mass, while the theoretical force used the formula mv^2/r. The participant initially used the hanging mass for both calculations, leading to significant percent errors. It was clarified that the mass used in the theoretical calculation should be the mass of the rubber stopper, not the hanging mass. Correcting this error is essential for accurate results in centripetal force calculations.
Stevedye56
Messages
402
Reaction score
0
Hey i just had a question on a centripital force lab I did in school today. We had what was essentiall a hollow tube with a string through it, at one end was a hanging mass and on the other was a rubber stopper. The radius was kept constant by a clip marking the radius so it could not move higher or lower. The stopper was spun around with increacing masses hanging. We then had to calculate the V_T which i had no problem with. The Actual centripital force was the hanging mass converted into weight. When calculating the theoretical centripital force we used the formula
mv^2
r

Then to get percent error actual-theoretical/actual x 100.

My question is i have percent error for a few in the hundreds, is there a reason for this such as the radius kept changing, or counting the revolutions could have been wrong considering how fast it was.

P.S I am sorry if i didnt make this clear if i didnt ill clear it up to the best of my ability.


Thanks for taking the time to look,

-Steve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, sounds familiar.

A few common errors in this lab:

Which mass did you multiply by g to get the "actual" Fc ?

Which mass did you use in the mv^2/r formula?

Did you square the speed?
 
I multiplied for the first trial by .055kg and i used the same mass for the remainder of the calculations. And yes, i did remeber to square the speed, i did it separately to make sure i did not forget that step. Heres the calculations I had.

hanging mass: .055kg
time for n rev.= 5.12s
n of rev.=10

n2pir/T= 102pi(.37m)/5.12s = 4.5 m/s

actual F_c 9.8(.055)= .54N

theoretical F_c= mv^2/r=.055(4.5)^2/.37=3.0N

%difference
.54-3.0/.54= 4.6 x 100= 460% error ?

I must have done something wrong
 
Yes, you did something wrong. The "m" in the "theoretical" Fc is not the hanging mass, but the mass of the stopper. What was it, 0.012 kg?
 
Chi Meson said:
Yes, you did something wrong. The "m" in the "theoretical" Fc is not the hanging mass, but the mass of the stopper. What was it, 0.012 kg?

Wow. Yes, it was close to that at .0102kg.

Thank you.

-Steve
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top