Understanding Direction Vectors in Vector Geometry

  • Thread starter Thread starter kougou
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line
AI Thread Summary
A direction vector in vector geometry signifies only the direction of a line and does not necessarily lie on the line itself. It is defined as being parallel to the line, meaning any vector parallel to the line can serve as a direction vector. The confusion arises from the distinction between direction and position, as direction vectors do not provide information about magnitude or specific location. Understanding this concept is crucial for progressing to more complex vector representations, such as component form. Continued practice with these concepts will enhance familiarity and comfort with vector geometry.
kougou
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
[equation for a line] help...

Homework Statement



so, as i am reading the textbook, it says, " given a point P it its evident geometrically that there is exactly one line through p which is parallel to a given non zero vector. This non zero vector is d (vector) is called a direction vector for the line if it's parallel to the line; that is, if d is parallel to AB for soe distinct points A and B on the line".

so confusion arises: I am not sure whether the direction vector d is on the on the line or not! you know, we could have any vector in the space, and as long as that vector is parallel to the line, then it's direction vectors... Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


A direction vector is exactly that: it signifies only direction. It says nothing about position or magnitude; hence it may be on the line, but not necessarily. But that's not terribly useful, just in of itself; so your textbook is probably just going to use it as a way to build up to describing vectors in component form (the i, j, k vectors are unit directional vectors.)

I know, my description is horribly convoluted. Sorry, it's a bit confusing at first, but keep working through it--keep reading! Pretty soon, you'll be more comfortable with vectors in component form than in magnitude-direction form. Or not (maybe it's just me, but I'm strange in that I <3 cross-products; unlike most of my classmates it seems.)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top