Understanding double-peaked HI profiles

  • Thread starter Thread starter clandarkfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hi
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding double-peaked HI profiles observed in the 21cm emission line from galaxies. It explains that these profiles arise from viewing a uniform disk edge-on, where the rotation of gas creates varying velocities that contribute to the observed flux. The double peaks occur due to the radial component of velocity, which results in higher intensity at the edges of the spectrum where the angle θ approaches ±π/2. This phenomenon is further clarified by considering a disk as a collection of rings, each contributing to the overall profile. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between the observed peaks and the galaxy's rotation dynamics.
clandarkfire
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. This isn't a specific homework problem, I'm just trying to understand a concept.

I've been studying the HI profiles (from the 21cm emission line). Almost all of them look like the attached profile. The velocity on the x-axis corresponds to the amount that the line has been redshifted, and the flux on the y-axis tells how much gas has that particular velocity.

With a simple model of an observer viewing a galaxy that is a solid, uniform disk edge-on, could someone help me understand why one would expect a double-peak HI profile. I've drawn tons of circles and tried to determine the flux at each velocity and the velocity at each angle, but I'm not getting it.

Ideally, could someone show me how to derive a function for flux as a function of velocity for the simplest case? I understand that the velocity of the center of the peak gives the total recession velocity of the galaxy and the width of the peak gives rotation velocity, but I don't see why there's a double peak rather than a single one.

Thanks so much!
 

Attachments

  • science.PNG
    science.PNG
    5.3 KB · Views: 500
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Consider a uniform ring, seen edge-on, where particles rotate with a velocity of v. Consider a point with the angle θ between our line of sight and the point on the ring (so θ=0 is the closest point, θ=pi/2 is at one side and so on). If we consider the radial component of the velocity only, we get ##v(\theta)=\sin(\theta)## and therefore $$\frac{dv}{d\theta}=v\cos(\theta)$$ and $$\frac{d\theta}{dv}=\frac{1}{v\cos(\theta)}$$. But ##\frac{d\theta}{dv}## just quantifies your intensity - how much material you have per velocity bin. As ##\cos(\theta)## is small for θ close to pi/2 and -pi/2, you get a large intensity there, the two peaks at the edge of the spectrum.

A disk is like a collection of many rings. Many galaxy rotation curves have nearly constant velocities (as a function of radius), so the peaks can be seen for the whole galaxy.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top