Understanding Electric Field Changes Passing Through a Waveplate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding how electric fields change when passing through a waveplate. The user is confused about the amplitude and phase shifts of the electric fields, specifically how to express the output fields after passing through the waveplate. It is clarified that the amplitudes of the extraordinary and ordinary components remain the same, while a relative phase shift is introduced. Additionally, an overall phase shift exists but does not impact the amplitude or polarization of the output wave. The user is encouraged to incorporate the relative phase factor into their calculations without altering the amplitude.
raisin_raisin
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am trying to figure out how the electric field changes before and after passing through a waveplate but my notes don't make any sense.
I think
Eextin=Ecos\theta and Eordin=Esin\theta
where theta is the angle the electric field makes with the optic axis.

I can't tell how the amplitude changes on Eout though.

I know they pick up a relative phase but I can't tell if this is in addition to a phase anyway.

i.e is it just
Eextin=Ecos\theta
and Eordin=Esin\theta ei\Delta\varphi

or if it should be the same but with a different amplitude i.e E' not E afterwards (in which case how do I calculate this?) or whether it should be

Eextout=Ecos\thetaei\varphie
and Eordout=Esin\theta ei\varphioei\Delta\varphi

Or should it be this with E' instead of E?
This is what my notes suggest but I am hoping it is wrong since delta phi is \pi so it would make it easier if it wasn't.

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming no absorption or reflective losses, Eext and Eord keep the same amplitudes. They do get a relative phase shift, so just tack on a factor exp(iφ) to one of the amplitudes as you had originally.

I know they pick up a relative phase but I can't tell if this is in addition to a phase anyway.
Yes, there is an overall phase as well, but that is not important as it does not affect the amplitude or polarization of the output wave.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top