Understanding Hinge Reactions: Debunking Common Misconceptions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between the normal reaction and the reaction at the hinge in the context of tension and forces. It emphasizes that the vertical component of the reaction at the hinge can be expressed as Tsin60 - 15g, depending on the chosen direction for positive forces. Participants note that the book's interpretation of the hinge reaction direction is incorrect, asserting that both weights create a clockwise torque, necessitating an upward hinge reaction. The conversation highlights the importance of defining positive directions when resolving forces. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing hinge reactions in physics problems.
Svelte1
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
https://postimg.cc/JtP2h113
Relevant Equations
f=ma
https://postimg.cc/JtP2h113
243800

I think I may have forgotten some more basic elements of tension and normal reactions. I do not understand why the vertical component of the normal reaction =Tsin60-15g

Because Tsin60-15g is negative when resolving upwards, i would have thought this meant that the normal vertical reaction would have to be upwards so that that we would have 0 acceleration
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Svelte1 said:
why the vertical component of the normal reaction =Tsin60-15g
You mean the reaction at the wall, not the normal reaction. (By definition, the normal reaction would be at right angles to the wall.)
Whether it is Tsin60-15g or 15g-Tsin60 depends on which way you are defining as positive. Tsin60-15g is right if down is positive.
 
  • Like
Likes Svelte1
haruspex said:
You mean the reaction at the wall, not the normal reaction. (By definition, the normal reaction would be at right angles to the wall.)
Whether it is Tsin60-15g or 15g-Tsin60 depends on which way you are defining as positive. Tsin60-15g is right if down is positive.

In the books workings it says they are resolving vertically upwards and clarifies that it is indeed the reaction at the hinge:
https://postimg.cc/Wtn5VyxJ
 
Svelte1 said:
that it is indeed the reaction at the hinge:
Yes, reaction at the hinge, not normal reaction.

The book is wrong about the direction. If you take moments about B, both weights have a clockwise torque, so the hinge reaction must be upwards.
 
  • Like
Likes Svelte1
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top