Understanding Lines of Invariance and Their Relationship to Rotational Matrices

  • Thread starter Thread starter morry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariance Lines
morry
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
Just need a couple of things confirmed for me guys.

Firstly, lines of invariance are always real eigenvectors right?

Secondly, how is this line of invariance related to rotational matrices? My line of invariance happens to be the same axis. Finally, how is the angle of the rotation calculated?

Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Lines of invariance" ? Are you talking about transformations on some Rn so that "lines of invariance" are lines that are not changed by the transformation?

To be "invariant", either every point on the line is mapped into itself or every point on the line is mapped into another point on the line. In either case, if v is a unit vector in the direction of the line, Av= αv for some real number α. Yes, lines of invariance correspond to real eigen-values. Obviously the lines themselves are neither eigenvalues nor eigen vectors.

Certainly, a rotation around a given axis leaves that axis invariant- the axis is a "line of invariance". As for "how is the angle of the rotation calculated?", that depends on what information you are given. If you are given the rotation matrix, find the eigenvalues. One, with eigenvector in the direction of the axis of rotation, will be 1, the others will be complex conjugates of the form e^{i\theta}, where θ is the angle of rotation.
 
Thanks for the help. Makes things clearer now. :)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top