Understanding Nodal and Mesh Analysis

AI Thread Summary
Nodal and Mesh analysis can be used interchangeably for circuit analysis, but the choice depends on the number of loops and nodes present. When dealing with inductors and capacitors, they can be modeled as frequency-dependent resistances, which simplifies the analysis. To determine the most efficient method, consider the number of independent nodes or loops and the presence of voltage or current sources. Utilizing impedances for capacitors and inductors can aid in applying these methods effectively. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving circuit problems involving reactive components.
byrner42
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I've referenced this forum many times so now its time to join!

My problem, I'm having trouble understanding Nodal and Mesh analysis (and when to use each one, and why), especially when inductors and capacitors are present.

For example here is a question that was proposed to me last semester in collage and I can't for the life of me find my previous solution and my head is wrecked!

Any help is greatly appreciated!

(Note if this is in wrong section, apologies, this is my first post =P)
 

Attachments

  • Sample Question.JPG
    Sample Question.JPG
    22.2 KB · Views: 673
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can actually use nodal or mesh analysis for any problem. They are interchangeable. There may be cases where it's easier to use one or the other, based on the number of loops and nodes.

For the problem you posted, you can actually model inductors and capacitors as frequency-dependent resistances. Do you remember how to do that?
 
KingNothing,

Yes I understand what you are talking about, but I'm not sure if I am able to do that mathematically.

Here is my attempt, and problem so far!
 

Attachments

  • Attempt 1.jpg
    Attempt 1.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 569
I have made no progress yet =P
Anyone out there have any ideas?
 
I'm having trouble understanding Nodal and Mesh analysis (and when to use each one, and why), especially when inductors and capacitors are present.

If you are trying to decide whether or not to apply Nodal or Mesh analysis, simply count the number of independent nodes/loops in the circuit. Also, take note of how many voltage/current sources there are as this may further simplify the nodal/mesh analysis.

With this you should be able to deduce which method will be the most efficient.

byrner42 said:
I have made no progress yet =P
Anyone out there have any ideas?

As KingNothing has already suggested,
you can actually model inductors and capacitors as frequency-dependent resistances.
Use impedances! Make a parallel combination of the impedances of the capacitor and the resistor, follow this up with a voltage divider and that should be enough to get the job done.
 
Last edited:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top