Understanding Simple Harmonic Motion with Position and Acceleration Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter physks4dumies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the relationship between acceleration and position graphs in the context of simple harmonic motion. Participants are exploring how to derive the position as a function of time from the given acceleration graph.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to relate the acceleration graph to the position graph, with some suggesting that the position graph should be a sine or cosine function. Questions arise regarding the nature of the graphs and how to accurately represent them without numerical values.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the graphs, with some participants providing equations and insights into the characteristics of the graphs. While some clarity is emerging, there is no explicit consensus on the final representation of the position graph.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with the assumption that the graphs are to be sketched without numerical data, which may limit their ability to visualize the relationships fully.

physks4dumies
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the acceleration as a function of time graph, we are required to sketch the position as function of time graph


Homework Equations


I know that the position vs. time graph is a cosine wave and the aforementioned is a sine wave. I have NO idea how to start considering there are no numbers involved.


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to plot the point of the a vs time graph corresponding to the position...only 1/4 back. In the end, i got a graph that looked EXACTLY like the first. help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if a=-\omega^2 x

it is possible to write x as a function of time...x=x_0 sin(\omega t)
 
I think this is meant to be in variables.
http://euclid.hamline.edu/~arundquist/latex/showequation.php?eqn_id=31336
so given the definition of the cosine graph, we know the amplitude and the period.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
well since the a vs t graph is a cosine function, wouldn't the x vs. t graph be a negative cosine function? (basically the same thing--inverted?)
 
physks4dumies said:
well since the a vs t graph is a cosine function, wouldn't the x vs. t graph be a negative cosine function? (basically the same thing--inverted?)

correct, though not entirely. the position graph will be adjusted by some constant. take a look at rockfreaks equation, what is it?
 
ooh i understand it now! Thanks eeryone
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K