Understanding Simple Harmonic Motion with Position and Acceleration Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter physks4dumies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on sketching a position vs. time graph using an acceleration vs. time graph in the context of simple harmonic motion. It is established that the position graph is a cosine wave while the acceleration graph is a sine wave. Participants clarify that the position graph can be expressed as x = x_0 sin(ωt), indicating a relationship between the two graphs. There is confusion about whether the position graph should be a negative cosine function, which is confirmed to be partially correct but requires adjustment by a constant. Ultimately, the participants reach an understanding of how to relate the two graphs accurately.
physks4dumies
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the acceleration as a function of time graph, we are required to sketch the position as function of time graph


Homework Equations


I know that the position vs. time graph is a cosine wave and the aforementioned is a sine wave. I have NO idea how to start considering there are no numbers involved.


The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to plot the point of the a vs time graph corresponding to the position...only 1/4 back. In the end, i got a graph that looked EXACTLY like the first. help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if a=-\omega^2 x

it is possible to write x as a function of time...x=x_0 sin(\omega t)
 
I think this is meant to be in variables.
http://euclid.hamline.edu/~arundquist/latex/showequation.php?eqn_id=31336
so given the definition of the cosine graph, we know the amplitude and the period.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
well since the a vs t graph is a cosine function, wouldn't the x vs. t graph be a negative cosine function? (basically the same thing--inverted?)
 
physks4dumies said:
well since the a vs t graph is a cosine function, wouldn't the x vs. t graph be a negative cosine function? (basically the same thing--inverted?)

correct, though not entirely. the position graph will be adjusted by some constant. take a look at rockfreaks equation, what is it?
 
ooh i understand it now! Thanks eeryone
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top