Understanding Tensor Gradients in R3

  • Thread starter Thread starter EsmeeDijk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient Tensor
EsmeeDijk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have the following orthogonal tensor in R3:
t_{ij} (x^2) = a (x^2) x_i x_j + b(x^2) \delta _{ij} x^2 + c(x^2) \epsilon_ {ijk} x_k
Calculate the following quantities and simplify your expression as much as possible:
\nabla _j t_{ij}(x)
and
\epsilon _{ijk} \nabla _i t_{jk}(x) = 0​

Homework Equations


The equations given in my book are:
(\nabla f)_i = \Lambda _{ji} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_j} ( with a tilda on the last xj
\nabla _i = \Lambda_i^j \nabla _j (with a tilda "~" on the last nabla)

The Attempt at a Solution


My problem is that these equations that I have are all assuming that you have a tensor in the form of a matrix, but this is not the case I believe. Also in the book leading up to these equations you have a vector x which is dependent on xi and on ei. Which is now also not the case. Only the first term with a is dependent on xi or xj, but I can't imagine that the rest of the function just falls away..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is unfamiliar.
What do ##x,x^2## and ##x_i## represent in your formula?
Does ##t_{ij}(x^2)## represent the ##i,j## component of the tensor, in some assumed (but unstated) basis, calculated in terms of a parameter ##x^2##? Or does it represent the application of an order-2 tensor to a vector denoted by the symbol ##x^2##?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top