Understanding the Graph of U = k*abs(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph
AI Thread Summary
The potential energy function U = k*abs(x) is non-differentiable at certain points, leading to non-simple harmonic motion despite exhibiting periodic behavior due to stable equilibrium. The discussion revolves around deriving a velocity vs. time graph that resembles a sine function but consists of alternating line segments. The relationship between force and potential energy allows for the calculation of acceleration and subsequently velocity as a function of time, although initial attempts resulted in a linear velocity function over specific intervals. The conversation shifts to the challenge of deriving sinusoidal functions for simple harmonic motion, emphasizing the complexity of solving second-order differential equations. Understanding these mathematical principles is crucial for accurately modeling motion in this context.
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
----abs( ) refers to absolute value

The potential energy for a function is given as U = k*abs(x). The motion is not SMH because U is non-differentiable at some point, but is periodic due there being a stable equilibrium. I was asked to come up with a velocity vs. time graph for this...but I don't know how the hell they got it (I don't even know how to derive the sinousidal functions for SMH)...the graph is not a trigonometric function and looks a little like this:

\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Its sort of like a sine function, except with alternating line segments.

The t-axis runs horizontally through the middle and the v-axis runs vertically so that the velocity is 0 at t = 0. How do I get this sort of graph.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force is the (negative) derivative of potential with respect to position. So, you'll be able to find acceleration as a function of position. Then, do some chain rule stuff and you should be able to find velocity as a function of time.

edit: oh hey, you're the guy that helped me with my (other) gauss's law post.

edit2: oh wait, that just rederives K = -U.
 
Last edited:
I did what you said with a little bit of calc, but I ended up getting a linear function for velocity. The linear function does, however, portray the velocity function over selective intervals.
Guess I'll shift the question to something else: How would I mathematically derive the equations for the sinousidal functions of Simple Harmonic Motion?
 
It's easy to find velocity as a function of position, but I'm not sure how to find it as a function of time. But, SHM (for springs) is derived like this:

F = ma => \frac{d^2x}{dt^2} = \frac{-k}{m} x

In other words, the second derivative of position is proportional to position. The only functions that satisfy this property are the sine and cosine functions. Solving a second-order differential equation is not simple, so introductory physics books derive it this way.
 
oh...I don't know how to solve for second-order differentials.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top