Understanding the Improper Integral ∫eiωtdω = √(2\pi) from -∞ to ∞

zezima1
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Is ∫eiωtdω = √(2\pi) (from -∞ to ∞)

It should be so if my books derivation of the Fourier transform is correct, but they don't really explain why the above equality is correct?

can anyone show me how they get to that result for that integral or does anyone perhaps have a good link?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zezima1 said:
Is ∫eiωtdω = √(2\pi) (from -∞ to ∞)

It should be so if my books derivation of the Fourier transform is correct, but they don't really explain why the above equality is correct?

can anyone show me how they get to that result for that integral or does anyone perhaps have a good link?

If you set I = integral and multiplied by the same integral, you would have I^2. When you solve that you get 2pi but then you take the square root.

However, isn't is supposed to be equal to \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top