Understanding the Solution to ε = xe-x2

  • Thread starter Thread starter lecammm
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the equation ε = xe^(-x²) and its implications for axial strain in a bar under non-uniform deformation. The key point is that the local strain ε is defined as the derivative of local displacement u with respect to the axial position x, expressed as du/dx = ε. Participants clarify that du represents the change in length due to strain, while dx is the original length of a segment. The problem aims to illustrate how to handle cases of non-uniform strain, emphasizing the relationship between local displacement and strain. Overall, the thread seeks to clarify the foundational concepts of strain and displacement in the context of material deformation.
lecammm
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ε = xe-x2
L = L

Homework Equations



ε = ΔL/L

The Attempt at a Solution



xe-x2 = (ΔL - L)/L

∴ ΔL = Lxe-x2 + LI really don't understand how the solution got "dx" on the first step, also the delta L. I want to understand the first step, the rest of the solution I understand. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Solution.png
    Solution.png
    7.7 KB · Views: 484
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been around stress and strain all my professional life, and I can tell you that this is an unbelievably poorly worded problem. I think what they are trying to say is that the axial strain ε is a function of the distance x from the left end of the bar. If u is the axial displacement of a material cross section from its initial location before the bar was strained, then the displacement is related to the strain by du/dx = ε. You integrate this equation from x = 0 to x = L to get the axial displacement of the right end of the bar.

Chet
 
Thank you for your response,
I'm sorry, I still don't understand how you are getting du/dx = ε, I understand up to the point where you say, "is related to the strain". The rest I understand, thanks!

Is it just that du is the extension and dx is the original length of a segment of length?

But then what is δL? Is that du?
 
Last edited:
lecammm said:
Thank you for your response,
I'm sorry, I still don't understand how you are getting du/dx = ε, I understand up to the point where you say, "is related to the strain". The rest I understand, thanks!

Is it just that du is the extension and dx is the original length of a segment of length?

But then what is δL? Is that du?

What this problem is trying to do is to show you what to do in cases where the local strain in the bar is non-uniform.

Let x represent the axial location of a material cross section before the non-uniform strain is imposed, and let x + u(x) represent the location of the same material cross section after the strain is imposed. The parameter u is called the local displacement. Suppose we focus on the short segment of material that was originally between x and x + dx in the unstrained bar. The original length of this short segment of material was dx. If we now focus on this same short segment of material after the non-uniform strain is imposed, the new length of this same short segment of material is now (dx + du). The change in length of the short segment of material is du, and its original length was dx, so the local strain of the material is du/dx (the change in length divided by the original length). So,

ε(x) = du/dx

This equation is called the "strain-displacement" relationship for the non-uniform deformation.

Chet
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top