Understanding the Speed of Life: Experiments & Ideas

AI Thread Summary
Understanding the speed of life is linked to personal significance, prompting discussions on its importance. The conversation shifts to measuring the speed of sound, with suggestions for simple home experiments. One effective method involves timing the interval between seeing and hearing a friend clash cymbals from a measured distance. Another approach uses microphones to detect sound and calculate speed based on distance and time. The thread emphasizes the simplicity of measuring sound compared to the complexities of light.
Yaqout
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
We need to write down why knowing the speed of life would be important to us personally. Can anyone come up with suggestions? I would appreciate it.

I would also like to find experiments or information on how to measure the speed of sound. I would appreciate it if you provide me with experiments that are easy to do at home and don't need complicated equipement.

I'll be waiting your responses.
Thank you!:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the speed of life
Well if you live fast you die young, that's pretty important.

I assume you meant the speed of light.

For every material, there is a constant that determines the angle that light will refract through when it passes from air (or a vacuum) into that material. That constant is c and is usually written like this:

aircwater, this would be the constant for light passing from air into water, I think that the constant is called the refractive index, and in the case of water it would take the value 1.33 (maybe). This means that the speed of light in water is the speed of light in air divided by 1.33.

c also equals sin i / sin r where i is the angle of incidence and r is the angle of refraction.

Unfortunaktely this is as far as I can take you for light, I can't think of any experiment to actually measure the speed of light. However I can tell you that it is approximately 2.997 * 10^8 m/s.

For sound though, that is much simpler. For this you will need a stopwatch, a pair of symbols and a friend willing to walk as far down the street as possible.
Your friend clashes the symbols together as hard as he can and when you see him do this, start the stopwatch. When you hear the sound stop the stopwatch. As bigger distance as possible is needed for this to make it more accurate, but you will also need to measure the distance between the two of you.
Alternatively, if you had access to some microphones and some equipment, you could set it up so that when mic 1 detects a sound it starts a timer, then when mic 2 detects a sound it stops a timer. Place them a measured distance apart and have them both facing the same way. Stand directly in line with the two of them but closest to mic 1, then clap two wooden blocks together. This will give the effect of measuring the time taken for sound to travel from mic 1 to mic 2, then speed = distance/time.

I hope this has helped you out for the sound, sorry about not being able to help you out so much for the light.
 
Oh sorry, what I meant was the speed of sound, not speed of light, what a mistake.

I'll be thankfull for further suggestions.
 
Well if you go back and read my post, you'll find a little experiment for measuring the speed of sound that's easy to perform.

Get a friend to stand a measured distance away, then have him clash two symbols together and time from when you see the symbols clash until you hear them.
The use the equation speed = distance/time to find the speed of sound.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top