Understanding the Strength of an Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
The strength of an electric field is defined by the equation E = F/q, where E represents the electric field strength, F is the force on a test charge, and q is the magnitude of that charge. The force experienced by the test charge varies with distance from the source charge, leading to the conclusion that electric field strength is location-dependent. While the electric field can have a specific value at a point, it is not constant throughout space, except in uniform fields like those between parallel plate capacitors. The electric field is a vector field, characterized by direction and magnitude, represented by E field lines. Understanding the electric field requires recognizing its dependence on the position relative to the source charge.
danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
Hey. Was just reading through some notes, and found the equation for the strength of an electric field:

<br /> E = \frac{F}{q}<br />

Im a little confused. How can an electric field have a single value that can define its strength, if the force, F, on the test charge, q, is dependant upon the distance of the test charge from the source charge?

Thanks in advance,
Dan.

PS. This isn't a homework question, just something that i came across that had me confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
E = F/q is specific to a point in space with a given force. Electric field, relative to a point charge does depend on distance in the same way you would expect, E = q/r^2 . The only time you would get a constant E that applied to every point in a space would be in a situation like that which occurs between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor
 
Last edited:
ok. So really, at a basic level, there is no way to state the strength of an electric field, without it being relative to a specific point?
 
The electric field is just that -- a field. You represent it with E field lines. The E field is a vector field. At any point in space, E has a vector value that points in the direction of the E field lines in that area.
 
Ok makes sense. Thanks for the help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top