Understanding the Time Offset in EM Plane Waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxsthekat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Plane Wave
AI Thread Summary
The minus sign in the EM wave equations indicates the direction of wave propagation, with a negative wt term signifying movement in the positive x direction. If the term were positive, the wave would travel in the negative x direction instead. This relationship can be understood through the concept of shifting functions, where f(x-1) represents a shift to the right. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding these shifts in relation to wave behavior. Overall, grasping these concepts is crucial for comprehending electromagnetic wave dynamics.
maxsthekat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework question so much as a general question about the equation I see used in the textbook:

The E field of an EM wave is defined as E(x, y, z, t) = E0sin(kx - wt)y_hat and the B field of an EM wave is defined as B(x, y, z, t) = B0sin(kx - wt)z_hat.

Why is there a minus sign in front of the wt term? I understand how kx (the offset in space) is positive; why wouldn't the time offset (wt) also be positive in this equation?

Thanks!

-Max
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The minus sign just means the wave is traveling in the +x direction.

You could have it be +wt. In that case the wave travels in the -x direction.
 
I see... But, why is a +x direction a -wt term?
 
At t = 0
. f(k). .........

At t = t
..... f(k-wt) .....

Where f(k) is a pulse

see f(x-5) goes towards positive side and f (x+5) is at negative side or you can use the word "shift". This can understood good if you use one simple pulse rather than a complex sinusoidal function
 
maxsthekat said:
I see... But, why is a +x direction a -wt term?

Hmmm. Well, let me ask a somewhat more basic question. Do you understand why a graph of the function f(x-1) would look the same as f(x), except that it would be shifted by 1 unit in the +x direction?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top