Understanding Work Homework: Does System Do Work on Environment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter merzperson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between kinetic energy, potential energy, and work done in a system. When the kinetic energy decreases, as indicated by the equation W = K1 - K2, where K1 is greater than K2, it confirms that the work done (W) is positive. This implies that the system does work on the environment, as energy conservation dictates that the lost energy must transfer to the environment. The conclusion is that a decrease in kinetic energy indicates work done by the system on the environment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic and potential energy concepts
  • Familiarity with the work-energy principle
  • Basic knowledge of energy conservation laws
  • Ability to manipulate and interpret equations in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in detail
  • Explore examples of energy transfer in closed systems
  • Learn about the implications of energy conservation in thermodynamics
  • Investigate the relationship between work and energy in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching energy concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy transfer in physical systems.

merzperson
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The kinetic energy of a system decreases while its potential energy and thermal energy are unchanged. Does the environment do work on the system, or does the system do work on the environment?

Homework Equations



W = K1 - K2

The Attempt at a Solution



I got the answer to this question wrong, so I'm having trouble understanding exactly what's going on here (as usual the textbook is of no help, and we didn't cover this explicitly in class...).

Here is what sense I can make in my head, but I just want to make sure I am not making anything up:

The kinetic energy decreases, so we know the final K (K2) is less than the initial K (K1):
W = K1 - K2 and K1 > K2 so W > 0
Since W is positive, the system does work on the environment.

Is this correct logic? How would you have approached the problem? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks good.

Another way to think about it: the system lost energy. That energy had to go somewhere, since energy is conserved. The system lost energy by doing work on the environment.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K