Understanding Zero Slope in Distance & Velocity Graphs

AI Thread Summary
A zero slope in a distance vs. time graph indicates that the object is not moving, meaning there is no change in distance over time. In contrast, a zero slope in a velocity vs. time graph signifies constant velocity, which can also mean the object is at rest if the velocity is zero. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding how slope relates to motion in these graphs. It emphasizes that a flat line on a distance vs. time graph represents no motion, while a flat line on a velocity vs. time graph indicates constant velocity. Overall, these concepts are crucial for analyzing motion in physics.
Jayman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Help! please what motion is occurring when the slope of a distance vs. time graph is zero

Homework Statement


slope of a distance vs. time graps is zero and constant and changeing
slope of a velocity vs. time graph is zero and constant
what types of distances are there?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well I assume when you learned early algebra, you learned that slope = change of y / change of x. Given that, what is the slope of a distance vs time graph equivalent to? (and what about velocity vs time?)
 


there is no motion. it means that the the object is standing still.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Experimentally calculating the acceleration due to gravity
Replies
13
Views
3K
Inconsistency in a Velocity-Time Graph
Replies
13
Views
3K
A child rolls a marble....Plot graphs etc.
Replies
4
Views
5K
Slope of Force vs Frequency^2 and Radius vs Period^2 Graphs
Replies
6
Views
8K
C 12B 2021 #23Analyzing Motion Graphs: Understanding Slopes and Acceleration
Replies
2
Views
2K
Motion in one dimension -- Experiments with a Hot Wheels car rolling down a ramp
Replies
12
Views
4K
Slope of position vs time squared graph?
Replies
2
Views
13K
Obtaining Acceleration from Position vs Time graph
Replies
3
Views
5K
Capacitance vs. Inverse Distance Graph's Slope
Replies
2
Views
5K
Finding acceleration from Velocity vs Position graph
Replies
2
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top